Publication
Global rules on foreign direct investment (FDI)
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Author:
South Africa | Publication | 3月 2024
On March 04, 2024 the Pretoria High Court gave judgment in favour of The Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London against the Minister of Safety and Security (the Minister) for R93 919 298.47 based on its finding that the conduct of police employees who participate in a major robbery and cover-up was sufficiently closely connected to their employment to make the Minister vicariously liable.
The case arises from a robbery which occurred at the SBV cash centre at Emalahleni in April 2014. In criminal proceedings against the robbers, the high court found that two South African Police Service (SAPS) employees were involved in the planning and execution of the robbery and that the SAPS employees were on duty at one or more times before, during, and after the robbery.
The stolen cash was the property of Nedbank, and three other banks. Nedbank, as the host bank at the cash centre, suffered the bulk of the loss. Nedbank was also required to make good the losses suffered by the other banks. Nedbank in turn claimed an indemnity from SBV for its loss.
SBV was indemnified by Lloyd’s for the loss. Lloyd’s took cession of the rights of SBV against the Minister, as well as any rights of the banks as the owners of the stolen money against the Minister.
The claim was based on the Minister’s vicarious liability for the conduct of its employees who were alleged to be acting in the course and scope of their employment in participating in the planning and execution of the robbery and in preventing the detection and proper investigation of the robbery and frustrating the recovery of the stolen cash. In the civil proceedings, the Minister was found to have admitted the involvement of the SAPS employees in the robbery as set out in the judgment in the criminal proceedings.
The Minister argued that:
The court awarded Lloyd’s damages of R93 919 298.47 as well as interest at the prescribed rate from April 2014 until date of payment and costs, including the costs of two counsel. Interest was awarded because the amount of the damages was known from the date of demand.
Lloyd’s was represented in the proceedings by Andrew Strachan from the commercial litigation team, assisted by Yishika Moodley and Lara Thom.
Publication
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Publication
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Publication
Our Asia Competition Law facts sheets provide insights into the main competition law regimes across Asia, reflecting the experience and reach of our Asia competition team in an ever changing and increasingly complex competition law environment.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023