![Global rules on foreign direct investment](https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/images/nrf/nrfweb/knowledge/publications/us_24355_legal-update--fdi-alert.jpeg?w=265&revision=a5124a65-abf9-40e4-8e96-9df39ffdb212&revision=5250068427347387904&hash=96B456347C3246E5649838DF281C5F5D)
Publication
Global rules on foreign direct investment (FDI)
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Royaume-Uni | Publication | avril 2020
As HMRC’s reconciliation process for guaranteed minimum pensions draws to a close, new guidance gives a useful snapshot of the issues UK pension scheme trustees and administrators need to tackle if they discovered over- or underpayments of pension as a result.
In the past, schemes have been encouraged to try to sort out those small adjustments to pension as part of a wider GMP equalisation exercise so as not to confuse members with multiple adjustments. However delays in clarifying equalisation requirements have led PASA’s GMP equalisation working group (GMP EWG) to suggest now splitting the two exercises where practicable. That said, schemes could and should use the GMP rectification process to set themselves up properly for the next stage of equalisation so the guidance gives a road map on how to do this.
There are four stages to the road map proposed by the GMP EWG in March 2020:
This is where GMP rectification and GMP equalisation projects sit most closely together.
The first step is finishing off the reconciliation process with HMRC if you haven’t already done so. That means sorting out any stalemate cases and dealing with all outstanding queries.
The next steps are working out how the populations for GMP rectification and GMP equalisation overlap and then planning the data cleanse so that you get all the right information for each population at the same time. When you don’t have the data, and cannot get it, any assumptions to fill in the gaps should be common to the two exercises, rather than having two distinct projects. If you have a number of members with only pre-May 17, 1990 service, GMP equalisation isn’t relevant unless you also plan to convert the whole GMP into alternative benefits. Equally, just updating the GMP on your system may be enough for rectification but your equalisation plan may need a full National Insurance earnings history, so get all the information in one go.
The guidance identifies three ways of rectifying benefits for pensioners and their dependants:
If only the payroll GMP is adjusted, the necessary data may not be there for GMP equalisation purposes; for example, if it came from a transfer-in where pre- and post-May 17, 1990, GMP needs to be broken out.
The first priority is to get new pensions in payment and transfers out dealt with first to avoid making the problem worse. The second priority is to deal with existing pensioners in payment. The longer overpayments are left to grow, the harder it becomes to seek repayment.
We would add that the Pensions Ombudsman has also shown some preference for schemes to recover overpayments over a similar period to the one for which the problem lasted. That inevitably means some pensioners will die before full recovery has been made, so the sooner recovery starts, the better.
Equally, pensioners are entitled to receive their full benefit, and trustees will remain in breach of trust until they have made up the shortfall to the extent required.
Any members without post-May 17, 1990 service (or transferred in service) can and should be dealt with straight away, before picking up the more tricky pool of members with a combination of rectification and equalisation issues. Again, the rectification process should be done with the equalisation process firmly in mind – if someone has been overpaid, but they will also be entitled to a small uplift for equalisation, recovery should in practice be limited to the net overpayment, so may need to wait until the equalisation calculations have been completed.
The guidance also lists the other drivers that trustees will need to take into account, such as:
The guidance is short on detail – schemes can’t use it as a blueprint to getting rectification done, but it is a useful overview of the issues that trustees should be balancing up, and a reminder of how much can and should be progressed now before any GMP equalisation project fully kicks off.
The GMP EWG guidance can be found here. It also contains links to other PASA guidance that may be relevant to GMP rectification.
Publication
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Publication
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Publication
We are delighted to announce that Al Hounsell, Director of Strategic Innovation & Legal Design based in our Toronto office, has been named 'Innovative Leader of the Year' at the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA) Awards.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023