Publication
Insurance regulation in Asia Pacific
Ten things to know about insurance regulation in 19 countries.
Welcome to our latest issue of the International Restructuring Newswire.
"Change is inevitable in music—things change."
– John Coltrane
What legendary jazz musician John Coltrane said about music holds equally true in the restructuring world. Changes in restructuring laws and strategies are inevitable. Practitioners need to be ever vigilant of changes that will have an enormous impact on how to effectively restructure distressed companies.
In this issue, we help to keep you abreast of new developments in a variety of jurisdictions, places where Norton Rose Fulbright advises its clients on the leading cross-border restructurings. In the Netherlands, we look at new cases with far-reaching consequences using the Dutch Scheme (WHOA). Our article on the UK discusses new cross-border jurisdictional techniques based on newly incorporated English companies. How Singapore courts deal with insolvency and cryptocurrencies and evolving techniques in the US for liability management are also covered in this issue. Finally, we look at how Australia's Parliament is embracing change in its far-reaching review of Australia's insolvency laws.
Good reading! And we hope to see many of you at the upcoming INSOL International conference in Tokyo in September.
Howard Seife
Global Co-Head of Restructuring
New York
Scott Atkins
Global Co-Head of Restructuring
Sydney
Publication
Ten things to know about insurance regulation in 19 countries.
Publication
In King Crude Carriers SA & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 719 the Court of Appeal held that the claimant sellers (the Sellers) were entitled to claim the deposits promised under sale contracts as a debt despite the defendant buyers’ (the Buyers) breach of contract, which had resulted in the non-fulfilment of a condition precedent to the payment of the deposits.
Publication
As previously observed, conflicts occasionally arise between mortgagees and charterers where a mortgagee wishes to take prompt action to enforce its rights, but the charterer wishes such enforcement action to be deferred until the end of the charter.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025