Publication
Insurance regulation in Asia Pacific
Ten things to know about insurance regulation in 19 countries.
Global | Publication | July 2024
In Türkiye, companies with foreign ownership (FDI Companies) must notify foreign direct investments (FDI) to the Ministry of Industry and Technology (the Ministry), but approval is only required to establish a liaison office. In certain sectors, however, FDI is prohibited or restricted.
Since 2018, the notification process for FDI Companies is largely online and completed through the Ministry’s e-notification system. Changes to the capital and shareholding structure of FDI Companies must be notified within one month. Otherwise, FDI Companies submit annual notifications by filling out a standard form requiring general information pertaining to the FDI Company, including its trading name, address, tax identification number, and brief information regarding its subsidiaries, if any. In addition, the form requires disclosure of the FDI Company’s shareholding structure, including the percentage of equity held by foreign shareholder(s). Finally, the notification form also asks whether any FDI were made in the previous year, and if so, in what amount, whether any profit was transferred overseas, and whether any franchise, know-how, licensing or technical support agreements were signed.
Foreign entities seeking to establish a liaison office must obtain approval from the Ministry. Liaison offices may not engage in any commercial activity and therefore may not generate any income or incur any losses. Permits to establish liaison offices are limited to three years, but may be extended.
Except in certain limited sectors, foreign investors are free to make FDI in Türkiye on an equal footing with Turkish investors. The most relevant sectors in which FDI is prohibited or restricted are broadcasting, maritime activities, real estate, and aviation:
Utku Ünver, Partner on secondment to Turkish local alliance firm Pekin Bayar Mizrahi
Damla Çay, Associate, Istanbul
Publication
Ten things to know about insurance regulation in 19 countries.
Publication
In King Crude Carriers SA & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 719 the Court of Appeal held that the claimant sellers (the Sellers) were entitled to claim the deposits promised under sale contracts as a debt despite the defendant buyers’ (the Buyers) breach of contract, which had resulted in the non-fulfilment of a condition precedent to the payment of the deposits.
Publication
As previously observed, conflicts occasionally arise between mortgagees and charterers where a mortgagee wishes to take prompt action to enforce its rights, but the charterer wishes such enforcement action to be deferred until the end of the charter.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025