Publication
Ontario’s Working for Workers Five Act receives royal assent
On October 28, Bill 190, Working for Workers Five Act, 2024 received royal assent.
Global | Publication | July 2024
On 25 July 2020, the Austrian Federal Investment Control Act (Investitionskontrollgesetz – ICA) came into effect. It significantly expanded the scope of foreign investment screening in Austria. Most cases concern the following sectors: health, data processing or storage and information technology.
FDI Regime
Foreign direct investment (FDI) screening in Austria is governed by the Federal Investment Control Act (Investitionskontrollgesetz – ICA).
The Federal Ministry of Labour and Economy (Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Wirtschaft – BMAW) carries out the reviews in consultation with the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs, the Federal Ministry of Finance, the Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology, the Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection and – depending on the specific foreign investment – with other federal ministries and the Austrian province (Bundesland) in which the target is located.
Internal restructurings are not exempted from the ICA and may therefore be subject to FDI screening (e.g., if a non-EU / non-EEA / non-Swiss group entity becomes a new shareholder). Asset deals are caught by FDI screening if the acquisition concerns an Austrian business (or material assets thereof). Acquisitions of an Austrian branch office (Zweigniederlassung) are not subject to FDI screening according to the current administrative practice.
The ICA only applies to foreign investors, i.e., to natural persons who are not citizens of, and legal persons which do not have their seat / headquarters in, an EU / EEA member state or Switzerland (foreign investor).
The foreign investment must concern the direct or indirect acquisition of
The Austrian target must be active in a sensitive sector. In its Annex, the ICA lists the sectors in scope and distinguishes between particularly sensitive and “normal” sensitive sectors:
Particularly sensitive sectors
The following sectors, as set out in Part 1 of the Annex to the ICA (exhaustive list), are considered to be particularly sensitive: defence equipment and technologies; the operation of critical energy infrastructure; the operation of critical digital infrastructure (in particular 5G infrastructure); water and operating systems that guarantee the data sovereignty of the Republic of Austria.
“Normal” sensitive sectors
Amongst others, the following sectors as set out in Part 2 of the Annex to the ICA (non-exhaustive list) are considered sensitive:
The BMAW interprets the scope of sensitive sectors very broadly. In practice, the notion of “critical” does not limit the FDI screening (and the notification obligation) to core sensitive sectors of the economy.
Even if the BMAW approves the initial acquisition of voting shares (i.e., 10% if the target is active in a particularly sensitive sector and 25% if the target is active in a “normal” sensitive sector), a later increase of the voting shares will trigger a new notification obligation if the subsequent threshold (i.e., 25% or 50% of the voting rights if the target is active in a particularly sensitive sector, and 50% if the target is active in a “normal” sensitive sector) is reached or exceeded.
Adding-up rule
Voting rights of foreign investors are added up in certain circumstances (e.g., if a foreign investment involves several foreign investors, if foreign investors are connected undertakings or in case foreign investors agree on the joint exercise of voting rights).
Exemption for micro-enterprises
The notification obligation does not apply to the acquisition of a micro-enterprise, including start-ups (de minimis rule). A micro-enterprise is an enterprise with less than 10 employees and an annual turnover or balance sheet total of less than EUR 2 million.
Review Proceeding
Any transaction for which a mandatory notification is required is subject to a standstill obligation until the BMAW has, or is deemed to have, granted its clearance. A transaction that is implemented prior to clearance (gun jumping) is provisionally invalid and constitutes a criminal offence, punishable by imprisonment of up to one year (in very serious cases up to three years). The ICA contains additional (administrative) penalties (e.g., for failure to provide relevant information). In case of completion of a notifiable transaction without prior clearance, the BMAW may also impose conditions ex post if it considers that the transaction poses a risk to security or public order. If no appropriate remedy is available, the BMAW may order the unwinding of the transaction.
The FDI screening proceedings in Austria are quite lengthy, even in standard cases: Following receipt of the notification, the BMAW kicks off the EU cooperation mechanism (which usually takes 35 calendar days). Only once the EU cooperation mechanism has been completed, the BMAW starts the national phase 1 proceedings (up to one month). Where the BMAW sees concerns as to security or public order (or requires additional time to review the matter), the BMAW will open an in-depth investigation (phase 2 proceedings) which may last up to an additional two months. In total, the FDI screening proceedings will take approx. 2.5 – 3 months if the matter can be cleared in phase 1 and approx. 4.5. – 5 months if the matter is pursued to phase 2.
Substantive test
The BMAW examines whether a foreign investment may pose a risk to security or public order. In assessing this risk, the BMAW mainly focuses on the following two factors:
In case of a risk to security or public order, the BMAW will approve the transaction only with conditions or, as a last resort, will prohibit the transaction altogether.
Publication
On October 28, Bill 190, Working for Workers Five Act, 2024 received royal assent.
Publication
The Federal Court of Appeal’s 2023 decision in Canada (Attorney General) v Benjamin Moore & Co [Benjamin Moore FCA] overturned the Federal Court’s decision in Benjamin Moore & Co. v. Canada (Attorney General) [Benjamin Moore FC] that had previously established a new test for patentable subject matter in computer-implemented inventions.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023