Publication
Taiwan: Competition law fact sheet
Main features of the law - Prohibition on restrictive agreements, concerted practices, abuses of a dominant position, unfair trade practices and M&A activities that restrict competition in Taiwan.
Publication | August 2017
“Which modifies Law 1361 of 2009, adding and completing protection measures for families”
Law 1857 of 2017 broadens the purpose of Law 1361, 2009 in order to enhance emotional, economic and cultural resources, in a democratic environmental and far-reaching context to reinforce the family as an institution.
From a labour perspective, said law allows employers to: (i) adapt working schedules to fulfill family purposes, and (ii) agree to flexible schedules for the said purpose.
Additionally, it establishes the obligation of the employer to: provide, promote and organize one working day every six months in order to support family integration.
In this sense, the employer shall comply with the following obligations:
Assign one working day every six months in order to promote family integration for the employees, by organizing it directly or through the family compensation fund (Caja de Compensación Familiar).
Grant one working day every six months in order to promote family integration, if it is not possible to promote and organize any activity directly.
Agree to a complementary working schedule, in order to compensate for the above-mentioned working days.
It may be concluded that such working days are not vacations, and do not affect the mandatory rest period established under Colombian labour legislation.
Publication
Main features of the law - Prohibition on restrictive agreements, concerted practices, abuses of a dominant position, unfair trade practices and M&A activities that restrict competition in Taiwan.
Publication
Unannounced inspections or ‘dawn raids’ are used by antitrust authorities to obtain evidence when there are suspicions that individuals or businesses have infringed the antitrust rules.
Publication
In this legal update, we offer our top three key takeaways following this decision, including important questions to be considered when negotiating dispute resolution clauses, especially where the nature of the transaction is likely to result in multi-party disputes.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023