Publication
Proposed changes to Alberta’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta is set to significantly change the privacy landscape for the public sector for the first time in 20 years.
Global | Publication | April 2017
On 11 April 2017 the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) issued draft “Measures for Security Assessment of Cross-border Transfer of Personal Information and Important Data Overseas” (Measures) for public comment. In this briefing, we outline the key aspects of the Measures and examine the implications for businesses in China.
The draft Measures are one step further towards the implementation of the National Security Law of China and the Cybersecurity Law of China (Cybersecurity Law), which will come into effect on 1 June 2017. Once adopted, the Measures will have a significant impact on businesses (in particular, multi-national businesses) in China which have operational needs for cross-border data transfers. Multi-national businesses should therefore review their internal cross-border data transfer policies and be prepared to make necessary adjustments once the Measures are adopted.
Under Article 37 of the Cybersecurity Law the data localisation requirements are applicable solely to operators of critical information infrastructure (CII). However, the Measures have significantly expanded the scope of the data localisation requirements so as to cover all network operators. Under Article 2 of the Measures network operators are required to store within the territory of China personal information and important data collected and generated in the course of their operations in China. For purposes of the Measures, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan are likely to be excluded from the territory of China.
The effect of Article 2 of the Measures is that the data localisation requirements would apply if:
If any of the above conditions is not satisfied, the data localisation requirements would not apply.
Furthermore, under Article 16 of the Measures, individuals and organisations in China not qualifying as network operators are nonetheless recommended to carry out security assessments of cross-border data transfers by reference to the Measures. This provision could potentially render all entities in China subject to regulation by the Measures and to the data localisation requirements under the Measures.
A cross-border data transfer is defined as “the provision of personal information and important data collected and generated within the territory of China to overseas institutions, organisations or individuals by network operators”. If broadly interpreted by the authority, a cross-border data transfer would be deemed to have occurred if a network operator:
Like the Cybersecurity Law, the Measures have yet to provide a clear definition (or specific examples) for “important data”. However, the Measures suggest that national standards and identification guidelines relating to “important data” will be issued.
Under the Measures, the competent industry regulators (e.g., the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the China Insurance Regulatory Commission, etc.) will act as regulatory authorities in relation to security assessments for their respective sectors.
If a competent industry regulator cannot be identified, CAC will assume the role of the regulatory authority. In addition, CAC will be responsible for the overall coordination of the security assessments of cross-border data transfers, and may issue instructions to industry regulators in this respect. It is expected that industry regulators may formulate implementing regulations for security assessments of cross-border data transfers in their respective industries.
In addition, national cyberspace authorities (e.g., CAC), public security departments (i.e., China’s police departments) and national security departments have the right to determine whether data shall be prohibited from being transferred out of China.
A security assessment of a cross-border data transfer should focus on the following aspects:
Based on the above, network operators must first prove the necessity of a cross-border data transfer before the data can be transferred out of China. However, the Measures have yet to provide any standard of proof in this respect. We understand that network operators may prove the necessity of a cross-border data transfer by explaining in detail the actual business needs.
Under the Measures, a network operator should organise a security assessment on its own initiative prior to a cross-border data transfer taking effect. Network operators are to be responsible for the results of security assessments - meaning that network operators will be held liable if there is any violation in relation to the security assessments. They will also be held liable if they do not proactively conduct self-assessments prior to cross-border data transfers. However, the Measures fail to provide specific punitive measures for network operators violating such obligations.
Network operators should report to their respective industry regulators for the relevant regulator to organise a security assessment under any of the following circumstances:
Security assessment organised by industry regulators must be completed within 60 working days, and the results will be reported to CAC. Data will be prohibited from being transferred out of China under any of the following circumstances:
It is clear from item (1) above that network operators must first obtain the consent from data subjects prior to cross-border data transfers. The Measures do not provide how the circumstances (1) to (3) above are determined. It is expected that subsequent national standards or guidelines may be issued to shed light on this.
After the initial self-assessment or regulator assessment prior to the cross-border data transfer, network operators are not required to carry out a security assessment every time they transfer the data out of China. Instead, network operators must conduct a security assessment at least once a year, and report the results to their respective industry regulators.
If the data recipient is changed, or there is any substantial change to the purpose, scope, amount, or type of the cross-border data transfer, or there is any material security incident relating to the data recipient or the data transferred out of China, a security assessment must be re-conducted in a timely manner.
The issuance of the draft Measures is a strong indication of the Chinese Government’s intention to impose data localisation requirements on all network operators and to tighten requirements in relation to cross-border data transfers. This is consistent with the concept of “Cyberspace Sovereignty” as reflected in the Chinese Government’s policies that underscore the Cybersecurity Law.
Once finalised and adopted, the Measures could present compliance challenges and increase compliance costs for businesses (in particular, multinational businesses) in China which have operational needs for cross-border data transfers. For example:
We therefore recommend that businesses:
As the Measures are subject to further revision and adoption, we will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates on any significant developments.
Publication
Alberta is set to significantly change the privacy landscape for the public sector for the first time in 20 years.
Publication
On December 15, amendments to the Competition Act (Canada) (the Act) that were intended at least in part to target competitor property controls that restrict the use of commercial real estate – specifically exclusivity clauses and restrictive covenants – came into effect.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023