Publication
Proposed changes to Alberta’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta is set to significantly change the privacy landscape for the public sector for the first time in 20 years.
United Kingdom | Publication | September 2024
This briefing is an updated version of our briefing first published in December 2017 and sets out some practical pointers for employers who wish to make changes to a pension scheme which may fall within the statutory definition of a “listed change”.
It also clarifies whether a statutory consultation is required where pension changes are effectively a side-effect of a transaction.
There is a statutory duty for employers in multi-employer schemes and employers with occupational pension schemes, or personal pension schemes to which they contribute, to consult active and prospective members before making certain changes to future pension provisions. Prospective members are, broadly, employees eligible to join. There is no requirement to consult deferred or pensioner members.
Two sets of regulations govern the consultation requirements:
Employers, trustees and managers of a scheme, and in the case of multi-employer schemes, any other person who has the power to make a change under the scheme rules (such as the principal employer), cannot make a “listed change” before consultation has been carried out in accordance with the Consultation Regulations. In many instances, a listed change will involve the exercise of the scheme’s power of amendment. However, there may be circumstances in which a change in practice under an existing scheme power, which does not involve the exercise of the scheme’s amendment power, will be a listed change. If the trustees have the power to make a change, they cannot do so unless they are happy that the employer has undertaken the required consultation.
Employers with 50 or more employees are subject to the consultation requirements. For multi-employer schemes, this could result in an employer with at least 50 employees having a duty to consult, whilst another participant employer in the same scheme with fewer than 50 employees having no such duty, although the changes would affect both sets of employees. These numbers relate to the total number of employees, not just employees who are pension scheme members. In a multi-employer scheme, each employer who meets the threshold has its own obligation to consult.
Some employers are excluded entirely from the consultation requirements. Exempt employers include those that participate in occupational pension scheme with fewer than two members and small occupational pension schemes, including most self-administered schemes (with fewer than 12 members and where all of the members are trustees of the scheme).
"Listed changes” in respect of occupational pension schemes are:
“Listed changes” in respect of personal pension are:
There is no requirement to consult on scheme changes if they are necessary to comply with legislation or a determination made by the Pensions Ombudsman. Additionally, the Consultation Regulations state that no account is to be taken for the purposes of the consultation requirements of “any change which has no lasting effect on a person's pension rights to be admitted to a scheme or on the benefits that may be provided under it”. We return to this exclusion below.
The employer must consult either as many of the affected members as is reasonably practicable, or their representatives. Where any of the following bodies exist in respect of affected members, the employer must consult with at least one of them:
If none of the above apply, the employer should consult directly with the affected members.
Employers must provide written notice to affected members or representatives about the proposed changes. The consultation period must last for at least 60 days. The information provided to affected members should include:
Consultation must be genuine and meaningful and should make clear that the outcome is not pre-determined. Although employers are required to consider any responses, they are not required to obtain employee agreement to the proposed changes. The Consultation Regulations impose a duty “to work in a spirit of co-operation, taking into account the interests of both sides”.
The trustees cannot agree to make a listed change unless they are satisfied that the consultation has been properly carried out. They may wish to see copies of the consultation documents and to be kept informed of its progress.
A failure to consult does not invalidate any change. However, employers may be at risk of a financial penalty of up to £50,000 (or £5,000 if the employer is an individual) from the Pensions Regulator. The Regulator has the power to waive certain legal requirements but only if it is satisfied that such waiver is necessary to protect the interests of the scheme membership generally.
In IBM UK Holdings Limited and another v Dalgleish and others [2014], the High Court held that the defective consultation process amounted to a breach of the employer’s contractual duty of good faith. Although a number of the findings in the High Court’s decision were successfully challenged on appeal, this finding was not challenged. The Court of Appeal held that members were entitled to claim damages from the employer in respect of its consultation failures. However, in practice it may be hard for members to establish that the outcome of the consultation would have been different even if the correct process had been followed.
If the employer changes its initial proposals for change as a result of members’ feedback during the consultation process, it may be in the unfortunate position of having to conduct the consultation anew in respect of the new proposal.
However, there are two sets of circumstances where a new consultation is not necessary:
For example, in a transaction where all employees of a group company are to be transferred to another group company (with no changes to pension entitlements under the group’s occupational pension scheme and the dormant company being wound up) is this a “listed change”? The Consultation Regulations require a 60-day consultation where the proposal is to “remove the liability to make employer contributions towards the scheme” in respect of affected members. A consultation must be conducted where a “listed change” will “affect” the scheme. However, as noted above, there is an exclusion to the consultation requirements where the change has no lasting effect on the members’ rights to be admitted to a scheme or the benefits that may be provided under it.
Does the transfer in our example “affect” the scheme? In this instance, as the scheme in question is a group occupational pension scheme and the obligation to make contributions was taken on by another group company, it is arguable that no consultation is required. This would also be the case where the pension arrangement is a group personal pension scheme or a master trust. The change would, however, need to be covered in any separate employment consultation under the TUPE regulations.
The Regulator also recognises in its guidance that it is not always practical to consult, for example, when restructuring is taking place and there is an immediate threat to either the scheme or employees’ jobs if the process is delayed. In such cases it urges employers to provide as much information as possible to those affected even if only on a confidential or restricted basis and to apply the longest practicable timescale before the changes are implemented.
We conclude by offering some tips for employers in conducting a successful consultation process:
Publication
Alberta is set to significantly change the privacy landscape for the public sector for the first time in 20 years.
Publication
On December 15, amendments to the Competition Act (Canada) (the Act) that were intended at least in part to target competitor property controls that restrict the use of commercial real estate – specifically exclusivity clauses and restrictive covenants – came into effect.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023