Arizona Antelope Canyon

Topic: Misselling and misrepresentation

 Subscribe to Misselling and misrepresentation

Securities litigation: High Court clarifies meaning of ‘reliance’ in s90A Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

November 08, 2024

Discussing the recent High Court judgment in Allianz Funds Multi-Strategy Trust & Ors v Barclays Plc [2024] EWHC 2710 (Ch).

High Court rejects misselling claim in respect of fixed interest rate loans

July 11, 2024

Discussing the recent judgment in Farol Holdings Limited & Ors v Clydesdale Bank PLC & National Australia Bank Limited [2024] EWHC 593 (Ch).

Banking Litigation Trends – Spring 2024 Update

April 15, 2024

Our Banking Litigation Trends publication explains the risks that financial institutions face so you can take practical steps to manage and prepare for them.

Complex financial mis-selling claim runs out of time

November 10, 2023

Discussing one of the last surviving disputes arising out of the 2007 – 2008 financial crisis.

What does my organization need to watch out for with ChatGPT?

May 12, 2023

Our Information governance, privacy and cybersecurity team have written an article discussing the rise of ChatGPT.

Banking Litigation Trends

February 01, 2023

Our Banking Litigation Trends publication summarising the trends we saw in 2022, and the key risks we anticipate banks and financial institutions may face in 2023.

Liability for misleading or untrue statements: ACL Netherlands BV v Lynch

November 03, 2022

In an historic first, the High Court has delivered a judgment on liability arising from a breach of s 90A and schedule 10A, Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, in the case of ACL Netherlands BV & Ors v Lynch & Anor [2022] EWHC 1178 (Ch).

Recent Court of Appeal guidance on damages for breach of warranty and deceit

October 14, 2022

In the context of a share sale, the Court of Appeal in MDW Holdings Ltd v Norvill & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 883 confirmed that a defendant cannot usually reduce its liability for breach of warranty by showing that contingencies or risks at the time of the transaction did not in fact occur.

Latest trends in English banking litigation: Duration and resolution of claims

May 09, 2022

The latest post in our series covers the recent trends in the duration and resolution of English banking litigation, including an analysis of whether fraud cases are more or less likely to settle

Group action dismissed: Barrister owed no duty of care to investors in film finance schemes

April 01, 2022

In McClean and others v Andrew Thornhill QC [2019] EWCH 3514 (ch), the High Court dismissed a £40m claim brought by investors in film finance tax schemes. Zacaroli J held that Andrew Thornhill QC owed no duty of care to investors and his advice in relation to the schemes was not negligent. The judgment includes helpful guidance on the duty of care owed by professional advisers and the application of both limitation periods. The case will be of particular interest to professional indemnity insurers, litigation funders and parties in various other film finance claims.