Introduction
As at October 31, 2019, the total
net assets of collective investment
undertakings (UCIs), including UCIs
subject to the Law of December 17,
2010 relating to undertakings for
collective investment, specialised
investment funds and SICARs,
amounted to EUR 4,577.890 billion
which shows a total increase of 8.81
per cent over the past 12 months1
.
The number of UCIs taken into
consideration is 3,785 compared to
3,807 the previous month2
. 2,482
entities have adopted a multiple
compartment structure, representing
13,545 compartments. Adding the
1,303 entities with a traditional
structure, a total of 14,848 units are
active in the financial centre.
Flexibility in the wake of a potential hard Brexit: CSSF press releases 19/48 and 19/54
On October 11, 2019, the Commission
de Surveillance du Secteur Financier
(CSSF) issued Press Release 19/48
(PR19/48) in relation to the UK leaving
the EU without an agreement on 31
October 2019 (hard Brexit). PR19/48
related to both: (i) UK managers
of alternative investment funds
established in Luxembourg
(AIFs), whether regulated or not (UK
Managers), which did not submit a
Brexit notification (a Required Brexit
Notification) to the CSSF by September
15, 2019; and (ii) UK Managers that
had submitted the Required Brexit
Notification by September 15, 2019.
CSSF Press Release 19/54 of 6
November 2019 (PR19/54) was issued
following the extension of the Article
50 period to 31 January 2020 and
revises the deadlines as follows:
“Following the decision of the
European Council of October 30,
2019 extending the period under
Article 50(3) relating to the United
Kingdom withdrawal from the
European Union, the reference
date for a potential hard Brexit in
all of CSSF’s previously published
communications should now be
read as January 31, 2020.
The subsequent application for
authorisation, or, as the case may be,
notification, or other information on
any action taken otherwise (notably
as per CSSF press release 19/48)
shall be submitted by undertakings
for collective investment and/or
their managers to the CSSF no later
than by January 15, 2020.”
UK Managers that don’t submit the
Required Brexit Notification will not
be entitled to continue their activities
under the transitional period provided
for under the laws of April 8, 2019 on
Brexit (the Brexit Laws) and will be
considered “third country managers”
from the date of a hard Brexit.
Accordingly they will, from the date of
a hard Brexit, lose the benefit of their
existing passporting rights.
UK Managers that wish to continue
their activities from the date of a hard
Brexit must now:
- Seek, prior to January 31, 2019
(based on PR19/54), the approval
of investors (and, as the case may
be, bondholders) in their AIFs that
such UK Manager remains a “third
country manager” after the date of a
hard Brexit;
- Confirm that the direct or indirect
investors of these AIFs are
professional investors (as defined in
PR19/48); and
- a duly signed confirmation that all
direct and indirect investors in the
relevant AIF qualify as professional
investors (as defined PR19/48);
- a copy of the appropriate
resolution(s) evidencing the
approval of the professional
investors (and, as the case may
be, of the bondholders), duly
signed; or
- when circumstances justify a
delay, an explanation of such
circumstances together with a copy
of the appropriate convening notice
(or draft consultation) duly sent to
shareholders/limited partners, and,
as the case may be, to bondholders.
The CSSF reserves the right to publish, in due course, a list of UK Managers that don’t comply with these requirements.
UK Managers who submitted the Required Brexit Notification, have, instead of remaining subject to the transitional regime as a result of such notification, been granted the possibility of opting to become “third country managers” for each AIF, subject to:
- Recalling their Required Brexit Notification;
- Seeking the approval of investors (and, as the case may be, bondholders) in their AIFs, prior to January 31, 2020 (based on PR19/54);
- Confirming that the direct or indirect investors of these AIFs are professional investors (as defined in PR19/48); and
- Providing the CSSF with:
- a duly signed confirmation that the notification submitted through the dedicated CSSF Brexit portal should be rescinded
- a duly signed confirmation that all direct and indirect investors in the relevant AIF qualify as professional investors (as defined in PR19/48);
- a copy of the appropriate resolution(s) evidencing the approval of professional investors (and, as the case may be, of bondholders), duly signed; or
- when circumstances justify a delay, an explanation of such circumstances together with a copy of the appropriate convening notice (or draft consultation) duly sent to shareholders/limited partners, and as the case may be, to bondholders.
Whilst the above statements made by the CSSF are based on the assumption of a hard Brexit occurring on January 31, 2020 (based on PR19/54), and the CSSF does not preclude the possibility of future legislative or regulatory modifications of the third country regime, the introduction by the CSSF of an option for those UK Managers having already made the Required Brexit Notification to become, subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions, third country managers, rather than remaining within the transitional regime, is welcome.
Brexit: Temporary permissions regime, deadline extended until 30 January 2020
As reported previously, the temporary
permissions regime (TPR) enables
relevant firms and funds in the EEA
which passport into the UK to continue
operating in the UK should the UK
exit the EU in a hard Brexit. The FCA
is accepting formal notifications from
firms and funds that wish to make use
of the TPR through a dedicated tool
available on its portal.
In light of the further extension to
the Article 50 process, the FCA’s
notification window for the TPR has
been extended and will now close at
the end of January 30, 2020. Any fund
managers that wish to update their
notification before the notification
window closes on January 30, 2020,
should email recognisedcis@fca.org.
uk by the end of January 15, 2020
at the very latest confirming this
and including their FRN. Additional
information on the TPR can be found
on the FCA’s website.
Luxembourg provides Brexit support to citizens and businesses
The Luxembourg government has made
available on its citizens portal a section
dedicated to Brexit issues (in respect
of both a deal and a no-deal scenario),
which includes an FAQ feature
summarising the rules governing
Luxembourg citizens residing in the
UK and those governing UK citizens
residing in Luxembourg in a number
of key areas (right to work, residency
requirements, family allowances, etc.).
The FAQ feature similarly summarises,
for both a deal and a no-deal scenario,
the rules which will affect businesses
established in Luxembourg and
businesses based in the UK after Brexit.
CSSF issues FAQ on swing pricing mechanism
On July 30, 2019, the CSSF published
an FAQ on swing pricing. The principles
outlined in the FAQ apply to all regulated
funds in Luxembourg (UCITS, UCI part
II, SIFs3
) that apply the mechanism of
swing pricing. The FAQ outlines certain
governance requirements in relation to
prospectuses, disclosure in the semiannual report, net asset value calculation
errors and other organisational
requirements. Where changes are
required to a prospectus, articles of
association or management regulation,
the CSSF has outlined that these should
be included at the next update.
CSSF online assessment concerning PRIIPs
On July 1, 2019, the CSSF issued
a press release concerning
packaged retail and insurance-based
investment products (PRIIPs).
The CSSF requires all SIFs, Part II UCIs
and SICARs4
to complete an online
assessment available on the eDesk
portal as specified in Circular 19/721
(Dematerialisation of requests to
the CSSF).
The CSSF explains that, as securities
or partnership interests issued by
Luxembourg regulated investment
funds are likely to qualify as PRIIPs,
the regulator would like to obtain an
overview of the impact of the PRIIPs
Regulation on Luxembourg-related
investment funds. The CSSF required
completion of an online assessment
first by October 31, 2019 and extended
the deadline until December 31, 2019
in CSSF press release 19/56.
From paper to e-filing CSSF launches eDesk Portal
On July 1, 2019, the CSSF published
Circular 19/721 which informs
supervised entities such as UCITS, Part
II UCIs, SIFs, SICARs, Luxembourg
management companies and
alternative investment fund managers,
of the establishment of an electronic
portal (eDesk Portal).
Going forward, these entities, including
in particular investment funds and
management companies, will be
required to use the eDesk Portal when
filing applications, updating existing
dossiers or submitting ad-hoc requests.
However, not all requests will be made
via the eDesk Portal from now on. A list
of eDesk requests has been published
and will be regularly updated on
the CSSF homepage. All entities are
responsible for keeping themselves
regularly informed of the updated list
of requests, thereby ensuring that the
available requests that are applicable to
them are completed appropriately and
in due time.
Additional information and guidelines
in the form of a user guide are available
online for each dematerialised request.
Access to the eDesk Portal requires
the creation of a user account by every
person or representative authorised
by an entity concerned to act on its
behalf with the CSSF in relation to the
requests available via the eDesk Portal.
Also, in press release 19/45, the CSSF
confirms that as from October 1, 2019
applications for new UCI approval
(UCITS, UCI Part II, SIF and SICAR not yet
registered on the official list) will have to
be submitted via the eDesk Portal.
However, in order to allow users to
become familiar with the eDesk Portal,
the CSSF has decided to put in place
a transition period ending on October
31, 2019 during which requests for UCI
approval may be submitted via:
- Email or secured e-file channels using
the current dedicated Excel form.
- The eDesk/UCI approval dedicated
application.
Importantly, as from November 1,
2019, the only possible channel will be
the eDesk Portal. Therefore, the CSSF
encourages firms to submit their next
applications, where appropriate, via
the eDesk Portal in order to get familiar
with the new communication channel.
Publication of the Prospectus Law
The law of July 16, 2019 on
prospectuses for securities, which
implements certain provisions of the
EU Prospectus Regulation and provides
for other requirements covering the
national prospectus regime, was
published in Memorial A – No 513 of
July 18, 2019 and entered fully into
force on July 21, 2019.
It should be noted that Article 4 of the
said law implements the option offered
by Article 3(2) of the EU Prospectus
Regulation, by exempting offers to
the public of securities with a total
amount in the EU of less than EUR 8
million, calculated over a 12-month
period, from the obligation to publish
a prospectus, while surrounding
this exemption with a number of
conditions. Thus, in particular, it is
required to publish an information
notice for public offerings of securities
with a total amount in the EU of EUR
5 million or more, this limit being
calculated over a 12-month period.
This law repeals the amended law of July
10, 2005 on prospectuses for securities
and is available on the CSSF website.
Implementation and longawaited clarification
On July 16, 2019, the Luxembourg law
implementing into domestic law certain
provisions of the EuVECA5, EuSEF6,
MMF7, ELTIF8 and Securitization
Regulations9 was published in the
Official Journal of the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg (the Law of July 16, 2019).
This law also amends the Luxembourg
Law of July 23, 2016 relating to
reserved alternative investment funds
(RAIF Law).
The Law of July 16, 2019 explicitly
designates the CSSF as the competent
authority in respect of the EuVECA,
EuSEF, ELTIF and MMF Regulations
and sets out the CSSF’s powers and
administrative sanctions that it may
apply pursuant to such regulations.
The CSSF is also generally designated
as the competent authority pursuant
to the EU Securitization Regulation
provided that the Commissariat aux
Assurances is the competent authority
for ensuring the adherence of the
obligations laid down in Articles 6
(risk retention) to 9 (criteria for creditgranting)
of the EU Securitization
Regulation by sponsors, originators
and securitization special purpose
entities established in Luxembourg and
subject to its supervision.
The Law of July 16, 2019 also
strengthens legal certainty by
amending Article 8 of the RAIF Law.
Henceforth, the RAIF Law provides
expressively that FCP10 (RAIF) may be
managed by Luxembourg management
companies authorized pursuant to
chapters 15, 16 or 18 of the Law of
December 17, 2010. Article 49 of
the RAIF Law is further amended to
allow for the conversion of FCP RAIFs
into SICAV11 RAIFs, giving additional
flexibility to both managers and
investors.
Increased obligations for market players in the wake
The Luxembourg parliament adopted
on July 10, 2019 the Bill of Law
7402 (the Draft Bill) implementing
the revised Shareholders Rights
Directive12 (SRD II) EU and amending
the Luxembourg law of May 24, 2011
on the exercise of certain rights of
shareholders in listed companies, as
amended by the Draft Bill (the Law).
Its entry into force is foreseen for the
first day of the month following its
publication in the Official Journal
of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(which, at the time of writing, has not
yet happened). In addition to the Law,
a new Regulation (EU) 2018/1212
will become applicable as from
September 3, 2020, aiming to improve
the communication between listed
companies and their shareholders.
The main objectives are to
encourage long-term engagement of
shareholders in listed companies,
reinforce shareholders’ rights and
increase the transparency of issuers,
institutional investors, asset managers,
intermediaries and proxy advisors.
Directors of the relevant entities will
be personally and jointly liable for any
damage resulting from the breach of
their respective obligations imposed by
the Law.
Strongly increasing interest for RAIF
As in the previous quarters, the
reserved alternative investment
fund (RAIF), the flexible investment
vehicle which has existed since July
2016, continues to generate strong
interest. Since its implementation, 843
RAIF structures have been created in
Luxembourg with a variety of different
investment policies and purposes
(time-to-market, incubation, private
wealth management etc.). This also
means that since the last reference
period of June 3, 2019, a very strong
number of 173 new RAIFs have been
created and added onto the official
list (meaning on average of more than
1 RAIF per day). The RAIF-product is
not only a fit for illiquid asset classes
but, mainly due to the availability of
variable capital structuring, also for
liquid asset classes including strategies
involving a high frequency trading.
As in the previous reference period
it may be observed that investors,
especially institutional investors, in
Europe and around the globe, have
got used to the product and have
included the RAIF as the SIF look alike
(and to a lower number SICAR look
alike) Luxembourg investment fund/
vehicle meeting the highest standards
of structural quality and flexibility, as
they were used to in a “real” SIF (or
“real” SICAR) but without an add-on
regulation on the fund/investment
product itself.
Besides this, for illiquid asset classes,
AIF’s structured as unregulated
partnerships (SCS or SCSp) have seen
strong increasing demand. Promoters
and investors appreciate the legal
framework allowing (to the extent
requirements are met) for a choice of setups
ranging from AIFs only managed by
a registered AIFM (and, for instance, not
requiring a depositary) to AIFs managed
by an authorised AIFM, both, for instance
allowing for investments without the
requirement of minimum diversification,
to the extent this is intended.
Even though the RAIF and the
unregulated AIF as described above
are currently dominating the structural
demand in alternative asset classes,
the SIF as the traditional regulated
fund vehicle with its year-long market
position and continuous flexibility
preserves its role in the range of
available fund products. This applies
certainly more for strategies involving
liquid asset classes and/or markets
where certain investors are more
comfortable or the legal framework
is favouring/requiring regulated fund
vehicles and funds not qualifying as
an AIF, such as fund vehicles reserved
for a pre-existing group of investors, i.e.
a family (please refer to the definition
provided by the European Securities
and Markets Authority).