Publication
Commonwealth Modern Slavery Bill passes through both houses of Parliament
Author:
Global | Publication | November 30, 2018
On 29 November 2018, the Modern Slavery Bill 2018 (Cth) (Bill) was passed in the House of Representatives, heralding a new statutory modern slavery reporting requirement for larger companies operating in Australia. The passing of the Bill marks the conclusion of the Parliamentary process and paves the way for assent to the Bill by the Governor-General.
The manner in which the Bill has been debated to date with great passion in both chambers of Parliament demonstrates the bipartisan acceptance of the need for such legislation in Australia and sends a powerful message to the business community that modern day slavery must be addressed as a matter of priority.
First introduced into Parliament on 28 June 2018, the Bill was debated in the House of Representatives before being passed on 17 September 2018, spearheaded by the former Assistant Minister for Home Affairs, the Hon. Alex Hawke MP, and in more recent months, by the new Assistant Minister for Home Affairs, Senator the Hon. Linda Reynolds CSC.
As we have previously reported, the Bill creates an annual reporting requirement for large businesses and other entities in Australia to report publicly on the actions they have taken to address modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains (see our dedicated Hub for more information). Within 6 months of the end of their financial year, reporting entities must submit a ‘modern slavery statement’ to the Minister for Home Affairs which details the following:
- the identity of the reporting entity;
- the structure, operations and supply chains of the reporting entity;
- the risks of modern slavery practices in the operations and supply chains of the reporting entity, and any entities that the reporting entity owns or controls;
- the actions taken by the reporting entity and any entity that the reporting entity owns or controls, to asses and address those risks;
- how the reporting entity assesses the effectiveness of such actions;
- the process of consultation with any entities the reporting entity owns or controls or is issuing a joint modern slavery statement with; and
- any other information that the reporting entity, or the entity giving the statement, considers relevant.
Amendments in the Senate introduced a mechanism by which the Minister for Home Affairs can require an explanation or remedial action if the Minister is reasonably satisfied that an entity has failed to comply with the reporting requirement. Following that, the Minister may publish the details of the non-compliance.
Once the Bill receives assent from the Governor-General and comes into force, we expect reporting entities with an Australian financial year will be required to provide their ‘modern slavery statements’ to the Minister for Home Affairs within 6 months of the end of the 2019-2020 Australian financial year. Entities with an international financial year will need to report within 6 months of their year-end.
Parallel reporting regimes – NSW and Commonwealth
NSW already has a statutory Modern Slavery reporting requirement (see our update here). The NSW legislation is awaiting proclamation and regulation before commencement.
Once the Commonwealth Bill becomes law, there will be two separate reporting regimes in Australia:
- Businesses and organisations carrying on business in Australia with consolidated revenue ≥$100 million globally will report only in the Commonwealth; and
- Businesses and organisations with employees in NSW and an annual turnover of between $50 million and $100 million will report only in NSW.
This assumes that NSW will accept that the Commonwealth reporting regime is comparable to its own (the NSW Act provides that commercial organisations reporting under a “corresponding law” will be exempt). The exact reporting criteria under the NSW law is to be prescribed by regulation, but as mentioned above, regulations have not been made publicly available. In the Second Reading Speech of the NSW Modern Slavery Act, the Hon Premier Gladys Berejiklian stated that the NSW Government will ensure the NSW reporting obligations will not overlap with any Commonwealth regulations.1 It remains possible that NSW will decide to increase its threshold by regulation to $100 million and pass all responsibility for managing modern slavery reporting to the Commonwealth, thereby delivering only one reporting regime.
Preparing for the new reporting regimes
At minimum, reporting entities that have not already done so should consider taking the following steps:
- Map the organisation’s structure, businesses and supply chains.
- Formulate policies and procedures in relation to modern slavery – this will involve collating current policies, identifying gaps, adapting existing policies and formulating new policies, as needed.
- Carry out a risk assessment – identify those parts of the business operations and supply chains where there is a risk of modern slavery taking place.
- Assess and manage identified risks – this may include carrying out further due diligence in the entity’s operations and supply chains and reviewing and adapting contract terms and codes of conduct with suppliers.
- Consider and establish processes and KPIs to monitor the effectiveness of the steps taken to ensure that modern slavery is not taking place in the business or supply chains
- Carry out remedial steps where modern slavery is identified.
- Develop training for staff on modern slavery risks and impacts.
To find out how businesses are managing risks of modern slavery in the broader human rights context, read our report ‘Making sense of managing human rights issues in supply chains’, published jointly with the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL).
For more information contact Abigail McGregor, Greg Vickery or Gavin Scott to discuss how modern slavery legislation may impact on your business and ways to manage your supply chain risks.
Need assistance with the Risk Assessment stage of your preparation? Norton Rose Fulbright has developed a modern slavery supply chain risk assessment questionnaire for third parties. The questionnaire brings together Norton Rose Fulbright’s global human rights expertise with the ethiXbase 360 powerful Third-party Risk Management platform to help your business identify, mitigate, and manage Modern Slavery risk in your supply chain. The questionnaire has many benefits including more accurate identification and effective management of human rights risk across global supply chains, and better compliance with evolving regulation, including the UK and Australia’s Modern Slavery Acts. Learn more about how ethiXbase can benefit your business. |
Footnotes
NSW, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Assembly, 6 June 2018, 77 (Gladys Berejiklian) https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/permalink?id=HANSARD-1323879322-102537
Related Articles
Recent publications
Publication
Paying the Price: Court of Appeal holds debt still due when non-fulfilment of a condition precedent is caused by the buyer’s own breach
In King Crude Carriers SA & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 719 the Court of Appeal held that the claimant sellers (the Sellers) were entitled to claim the deposits promised under sale contracts as a debt despite the defendant buyers’ (the Buyers) breach of contract, which had resulted in the non-fulfilment of a condition precedent to the payment of the deposits.
Publication
Can a charterer procure the release of a laden vessel arrested by a mortgagee bank?
As previously observed, conflicts occasionally arise between mortgagees and charterers where a mortgagee wishes to take prompt action to enforce its rights, but the charterer wishes such enforcement action to be deferred until the end of the charter.
Publication
ECJ confirms public tenders’ restrictions for companies from third countries with no procurement agreement with the EU
EU Member States may allow companies from countries that have not concluded an agreement guaranteeing equal and reciprocal access to public procurement (public procurement agreement) with the EU to participate in public tenders, provided there is no EU act excluding the relevant country.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .