Publication
Generative AI: A global guide to key IP considerations
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Canada | Publication | December 2019
In Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, the Supreme Court ruled that the son of Russian spies who lived in Canada under false identities at the time of his birth was entitled to retain his Canadian citizenship. This matter stems from a decision that was handed down by an administrative body, the Canadian Registrar of Citizenship.
The Supreme Court saw this and another case involving an administrative decision rendered by the CRTC1 as the perfect opportunity to revise the entire analytical framework that applies to judicial reviews. This decision’s scope will reach far beyond immigration and broadcasting and will impact all areas subject to administrative law, including employment law and labour relations.
One of the first things that the Supreme Court does in Vavilov is bring a few clarifications to the analytical framework that was developed in the well-known case of Dunsmuir2regarding the application of standards of review in matters of judicial review.
The court clearly explains that the standard of review analysis must begin with the presumption that reasonableness is the applicable standard in all cases. This presumption, however, is set aside in two types of situations.
First, the presumption will be set aside where the legislature explicitly prescribes the applicable standard of review, usually in the administrative body’s enabling statute.
For example, this will be the case where the legislature has provided a mechanism, either as of right or with leave, to appeal to a court from an administrative decision. This means that if there is a right to appeal, it is the standards of review specific to appeals that will now apply. Previously, the Supreme Court had ruled that it was the judicial review standards that applied to an appeal from an administrative decision. The court has therefore done a complete about face and set aside its own case law on the subject.
Second, the presumption will be set aside, and it will be the standard of correctness that applies to certain classes of well-defined questions, such as:
The class of truly jurisdictional questions is no longer subject to the standard of correctness. The Supreme Court has just abolished this class that had been recognized in Dunsmuir in what is yet another example of the Supreme Court overturning its own jurisprudence.
Under Dunsmuir, the presumption of reasonableness could be rebutted by resorting to a contextual inquiry.4 However, the Supreme Court clearly states that courts no longer need to engage in such contextual inquiries.
Finally, the Supreme Court gives specific instructions on how to apply the reasonableness standard. Without going over all of the court’s teachings, it would be expedient here to point out the following:
The Supreme Court has taken pains to clarify and simplify the standard of review analysis. We must now look to future case law to see whether this umpteenth reform will have achieved this highly commendable goal.
Publication
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Publication
The UK remains a world leader in offshore wind, accounting for roughly 20 percent of global offshore wind capacity, with 11.3 GW operational. It is forecast that installed capacity will rise to 19.5 GW by mid 2020s.
Publication
On 21 May 2024, the European Council (or Council) adopted the so-called ‘Hydrogen and decarbonised gas market package’ (the Gas Package). The package contains a recast of the 715/2009 gas regulation (Gas Regulation) and a recast of the 2009/73 gas directive (Gas Directive) aimed at reforming the existing EU regulatory framework to support the deployment of renewable and low-carbon gases, in particular hydrogen. As such, it represents a major development in the EU gas market.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023