The ‘Danann’ case stands for the now well-recognized principle that a specific merger clause—one encompassing the representations that are the subject matter of the fraud claim—will likely bar a plaintiff’s fraud claim that looks outside the agreement. Recent Commercial Division decisions applying this ‘Danann’ standard are instructive as to how specific that clause must be.

Read the entire article.



Contacts

Thomas J. Hall
Thomas J. Hall
Co-Head of Litigation and Disputes, New York
Email
thomas.hall@nortonrosefulbright.com
T: +1 212 408 5487
Judith A. Archer
Judith A. Archer
Co-Partner-in-Charge, New York
Email
judith.archer@nortonrosefulbright.com
T: +1 212 318 3342

Practice areas:

Recent publications

USPTO fee increases set for January 19, 2025 – Key changes and strategies to consider

Publication

USPTO fee increases set for January 19, 2025 – Key changes and strategies to consider

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has finalized an increase in patent prosecution fees, scheduled to take effect on January 19, 2025.

United States | December 20, 2024

Intellectual property
Changes ahead for California employers

Publication

Changes ahead for California employers

California is introducing legal changes that will impact employers statewide.

United States | December 13, 2024

Employment and labor
A Texas-sized injunction for the Corporate Transparency Act

Publication

A Texas-sized injunction for the Corporate Transparency Act

A federal judge in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas recently issued a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking the implementation of a crucial provision of the Corporate Transparency Act.

United States | December 11, 2024

Financial services and regulation
Site search

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .

Subscribe now