
Publication
US Supreme Court unanimously decided eagerly anticipated False Claims Act case
A unanimous Supreme Court says that contemporaneous knowledge matters in False Claims Act cases but does not provide needed guidance about ambiguous terms.
We use cookies and other similar technology to collect data about you to allow us to deliver our online services, measure our website audience and improve your browsing experience. Full details on the cookies we use are set out in our Cookies policy. Please click OK to signify your consent to our use of cookies.
You can withdraw your consent by clicking “manage cookies” and following the instructions shown.
For crypto enthusiasts, one of the burgeoning technology’s great appeals is its international reach. For litigants, though, one of its great hurdles may be that same international reach. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s recent non-precedential summary order in Barron v. Helbiz, 2021 WL 4519887 (2d Cir. Oct. 4, 2021), grapples with this point and addresses some of the challenges that can be made on extraterritoriality grounds to applying U.S. federal and state law in the cryptocurrency context. How far is too far when it comes to litigating crypto in the United States?
Robert A. Schwinger explores recent developments in this edition of his New York Law Journal Blockchain Law column.
Download the full New York Law Journal article, "Out to sea? Extraterritoriality challenges in US crypto litigation."
Publication
A unanimous Supreme Court says that contemporaneous knowledge matters in False Claims Act cases but does not provide needed guidance about ambiguous terms.
Publication
The EPA is relying on CCS and low-carbon hydrogen as the core technologies supporting newly proposed rules intended to significantly reduce GHG emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023