Global | Publication | July 25, 2024
Foreign direct investments (FDI) in Japan are regulated by the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act (the FEFTA). Over the past few years, there have been major amendments to the FEFTA, with the most recent amendments that came into effect on April 1, 2024.
Under the FEFTA, a foreign investor is required to make, through the Bank of Japan, a prior notification of its FDI to the Minister of Finance of Japan and the ministers having jurisdiction over the businesses conducted by the target, if the target is in a business sector designated as sensitive to national security, public order, public safety or the smooth management of Japan’s economy (Sensitive Businesses).
The FEFTA amendments expanded the scope of “FDI”. FDI refers to:
(i) A significant change in the purpose of the target’s business, unless the target is a listed company and the foreign investor and its closely related persons together hold less than a third of the voting rights;
(ii) A transfer of business in any designated business sector; or
(iii) The appointment of a foreign investor or its closely related person as a director or statutory auditor of the target, unless the target is a listed company and the foreign investor and its closely related persons together hold less than 1 per cent of the voting rights in case of (f)(ii) and (iii); and
(g) Other similar activities.
For an acquisition of shares in an unlisted company from a domestic investor, there is no threshold for the notification requirement, and even acquiring one share will trigger the notification obligation. Acquiring shares in an unlisted company from another foreign investor will not be considered as FDI for purposes of the notification requirement under the FEFTA and is called “special acquisition”. In cases of a special acquisition, unless the target is conducting one of the listed businesses, the scope of which is quite limited compared to the scope of Sensitive Businesses, prior notification is not required.
A foreign investor for the purposes of the FEFTA includes (a) a non-resident, (b) a corporation and other organizations established under foreign law, and (c)(i) a domestic corporation 50 per cent or more of the voting rights of which are owned by a non-resident or a foreign corporation or organization, or (ii) its subsidiaries.
Amendments that took effect in May 2020 expanded the scope of Sensitive Businesses triggering a notification obligation by adding 20 business sectors. The additional business sectors include software-related business, including contract development of software, built-in software and packaged software, and Internet use support services, which could be interpreted as including many software or Internet services. The expansion of covered business sections has a significant influence in practice. In addition, the manufacturing of medical products and devices for infectious diseases was added starting July 15, 2020 in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
To strike a balance, certain exemptions from the notification requirement were introduced by the recent FEFTA amendments. Requirements for such exemption include the obligation (a) to not cause their closely related persons to become a director or statutory auditor of the target, (b) to not propose to the shareholders’ meeting a transfer of business in any designated business sector, and (c) to not access any non-public technology information of the target relating to any designated business sector. For example, a foreign financial institution is exempted from prior notification when it satisfies the above conditions (a) to (c), even if it acquires 10 per cent or more of the shares or voting rights of a listed company that is engaged in a designated business. However, such exemption is not applicable to foreign governments or foreign state-owned enterprises, unless such enterprises are accredited by the Minister of Finance as not posing a national security risk.
There is a statutory waiting period of 30 days from the date of acceptance of the notification by the Bank of Japan, although such waiting period will be normally shortened to two weeks. However, it may be extended to up to five months if the authority identifies any national security concern.
The typical and recommended practice is to contact the relevant ministries in advance of the formal filing with the support of experienced lawyers and provide them with the required information such as the foreign investor’s capital structure, purpose of the investment, and plans for managing the target.
Even if the target is not engaged in any Sensitive Business, a foreign investor is required to make a post-closing notification of FDI. A foreign investor must make a notification within 45 days from the date of the investment. In addition, in certain cases, such post-closing notification is necessary even if exemptions from prior notification are applicable. There are also some exceptions to a post-closing notification requirement. For example, acquiring less than 10 per cent of the shares in an unlisted company will not trigger a post-closing notification requirement.
To close loopholes in economic sanctions implemented against Russia, certain capital transactions via crypto assets and stablecoins including the sale and purchase of crypto assets or stablecoins between a resident and a non-resident became subject to the FEFTA under the recent amendments to the law which took effect in May 2022 and in 2023. Also, pursuant to the amendments, crypto asset exchange service providers and stablecoin service providers are obligated to (a) confirm whether transactions consisting of making or receiving payments via crypto assets or stablecoins are subject to economic sanctions, (b) conduct KYC processes of customers relating to such transactions and capital transactions, and (c) report to the government regarding the intermediation, brokerage or agency of capital transactions via crypto assets or stablecoins in excess of JPY 30 million.
By Norihito Sato and Satoshi Tatsugawa of Mori Hamada & Matsumoto in collaboration with Norton Rose Fulbright.
Norihito Sato
Satoshi Tatsugawa
Publication
On 24 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that the European Commission’s (the EC) 2009 decision, which imposed a (then record) €1.06 billion fine on Intel, was flawed as far as it found that loyalty rebates granted by Intel had anti-competitive effects.
Publication
The Dutch tax classification system for non-Dutch entities will undergo significant changes as of 1 January 2025.
Publication
In King Crude Carriers SA & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 719 the Court of Appeal held that the claimant sellers (the Sellers) were entitled to claim the deposits promised under sale contracts as a debt despite the defendant buyers’ (the Buyers) breach of contract, which had resulted in the non-fulfilment of a condition precedent to the payment of the deposits.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023