Resource and tool
Australia's Modern Slavery Act: What businesses need to know
On 1 January 2019, the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) commenced, heralding a new statutory modern slavery reporting requirement.
Australia | Publication | November 2024
This article was co-authored with Yasmine Sahihi.
The Modern Slavery Amendment (Australian Anti-Slavery Commissioner) (Cth) Act 2024 came into force on 7 November 2024, which established an Australian Anti-Slavery Commissioner (Commissioner) as an independent statutory office holder within the Attorney-General’s portfolio.
Former Senator for Western Australia, Mr Chris Evans has been appointed as the first Australian Anti-Slavery Commissioner, with his five-year term commencing on 2 December 2024.
As the Commissioner, Mr Evans will support Australia’s response to modern slavery, and is expected to play a vital role in raising awareness about modern slavery at a national level, engaging with federal government agencies, and shaping the implementation of future modern slavery reforms by the federal government.
Mr Evans will be supported by Australian Public Service staff from the Attorney-General’s Department. Key functions of his office will include:
Despite the longstanding calls from NGOs and academia for the Commissioner to have stronger powers, the Commissioner will not have investigative or enforcement powers. However, there remains scope for the Commissioner’s functions and powers to evolve over time.
As part of the 2023-24 budget, the Government allocated $8 million to support the Commissioner’s establishment and operations. In the 2024-25 Budget it was announced that $2.5 million would be budgeted over two years to undertake an audit of the Government’s supply chains and procurement procedures to address modern slavery risks. This is in addition to $12.1 million in funding over 5 years for the new Forced Marriage Specialist Support Program and $2.2 million in further funding to extend the Speak Now project delivered by Anti-Slavery Australia which aims to prevent forced marriage through education.
As outlined in our earlier article update, the NSW Anti-slavery Commissioner is empowered by the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (NSW) to advocate for action to combat modern slavery, support victims of modern slavery, have oversight of NSW public procurement efforts to remove products of modern slavery from supply chains, issue codes of practice and maintain a public register related to efforts to address modern slavery risks in supply chains.
Although there may be some degree of overlap between the coverage of the NSW and Commonwealth Commissioners, it is likely that they will work closely together in a collaborative effort to address modern slavery.
It is anticipated that the office of the Anti-Slavery Commissioner will, in due course, develop guidance material and resources for the business community to support their compliance with the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth).
In conjunction with the detailed due diligence material and codes of practice published by the NSW Anti-slavery Commissioner, we are likely to see greater clarity on the horizon in terms of the expectations of governments, increased awareness of modern slavery within the business community, and the resumption of the ‘race to the top’ by businesses using sophisticated modern slavery risk management practices as a differentiator. Current suppliers to the Commonwealth should prepare themselves for the audit of procurement processes and increased engagement in relation to modern slavery from Commonwealth departments and agencies.
Publication
On 24 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that the European Commission’s (the EC) 2009 decision, which imposed a (then record) €1.06 billion fine on Intel, was flawed as far as it found that loyalty rebates granted by Intel had anti-competitive effects.
Publication
The Dutch tax classification system for non-Dutch entities will undergo significant changes as of 1 January 2025.
Publication
In King Crude Carriers SA & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 719 the Court of Appeal held that the claimant sellers (the Sellers) were entitled to claim the deposits promised under sale contracts as a debt despite the defendant buyers’ (the Buyers) breach of contract, which had resulted in the non-fulfilment of a condition precedent to the payment of the deposits.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023