Publication
The 2025 Dutch tax classification of the Brazilian FIP
The Dutch tax classification system for non-Dutch entities will undergo significant changes as of 1 January 2025.
Canada | Publication | July 3, 2023
A new federal Interpretations, Policies, Guidelines (IPG) document from the Federal Labour Program provides further clarification on reimbursement of work-related expenses as required by the Canada Labour Code.
As of July 9, 2023, new regulations regarding expense reimbursement will come into effect, pursuant to section 238.1 of the Canada Labour Code. In a previous post, we outlined the general requirements of those regulations.
This update summarizes “IPG-120- Reimbursement of work-related expenses,” which provides further clarification as to which expenses are subject to reimbursement. In order to be reimbursed, an expense must meet the four eligibility criteria:
i. The employee does not have to pay the expense as per a written agreement or collective agreement;
ii. The employee must have paid the expense out-of-pocket;
iii. The expense must be work-related; and
iv. The expense must be reasonable.
Whether an employee is responsible for an expense depends on whether there is a relevant agreement with the employer.
For non-unionized employees, an expense is not reimbursable when there is a written agreement that requires the employee to pay the expense. For example, if a written agreement requires the employee to pay for the cost of replacing a lost work uniform, the employer will not be required to reimburse the employee for that expense.
For unionized employees, an expense is likewise not reimbursable when a collective agreement requires the employee to pay the expense. For example, a collective agreement may require employees to pay for eye exam fees to get safety glasses to wear on the job.
If there is no such agreement requiring the employee to pay for the expense, the employer may be responsible for reimbursing the expense incurred.
An “out-of-pocket” expense is an expense paid with an employee’s own money on behalf of their employer.
When an employee pays for an expense with their own money (for instance, by using their personal credit card) that expense is eligible for reimbursement.
In contrast, if an employee makes a payment with an allowance or with a business credit card, the expense is not out-of-pocket and therefore not reimbursable.
Various factors are considered when determining whether an expense is “work-related,” including, but not limited to:
Similar factors to the third criterion are considered when determining whether an expense is “reasonable,” including, but not limited to:
When the above criteria are satisfied and an employer is required to reimburse an expense, it must do so within specific time frames. This again depends on the content of the employment agreement.
For unionized employees, the time limit for reimbursement is that specified in the collective agreement or within 30 days after the employee submits their expense claim to the employer, if there is no agreement.
For non-unionized employees, the time limit is that specified in the written agreement or within 30 days after the employee submits their expense claim to the employer, if there is no agreement.
The author would like to thank Isabelle Deschenes, law student, for her assistance in preparing this legal update.
Publication
The Dutch tax classification system for non-Dutch entities will undergo significant changes as of 1 January 2025.
Publication
As previously observed, conflicts occasionally arise between mortgagees and charterers where a mortgagee wishes to take prompt action to enforce its rights, but the charterer wishes such enforcement action to be deferred until the end of the charter.
Publication
For some time now, the European Commission (EC) and national competition authorities (NCAs) have been striving to catch so-called “killer acquisitions” under their merger control rules to thereby close a perceived enforcement gap.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023