Update
Beyond COVID-19: Employment and labor
Employers have obligations for the health and safety of their employees and to protect their personal data.
Australia | Publication | April 2020
On 8 April 2020, the Commonwealth Parliament passed amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) to assist employers who qualify for the JobKeeper scheme to deal with the economic impact of the coronavirus.
The framework for the JobKeeper scheme is contained in the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Act 2020, which was also passed on 8 April 2020. This Act empowers the making of rules for the operation of the scheme. The rules have now been issued and provide for payments to qualifying employers of $1,500 per fortnight for each eligible employee who is performing work for the employer or who has been stood down. An employer qualifies for the scheme on the basis of a decline in turnover caused by the COVID19 pandemic.
The amendments to the FW Act create a new Part 6-4C titled “Coronavirus economic response”, containing time-limited provisions which will automatically be repealed on 28 September 2020.
A summary of the amendments to the FW Act is set out below.
An employer that qualifies for the JobKeeper scheme and is eligible for a JobKeeper payment for a particular employee (a qualifying employer) must:
i. Pass on the JobKeeper payment of $1,500 to the employee each fortnight (or apply it towards the employee’s wages in accordance with the scheme rules);
ii. Ensure that the employee receives the greater of $1,500, and the amount payable to the employee for the performance of work during the fortnight;
iii. Not reduce the hourly rate of pay for an employee.
These obligations are civil remedy provisions with a maximum penalty of 300 penalty units for a body corporate or, in the case of a serious contravention, 3000 penalty units.
A qualifying employer can stand down an employee, without needing to meet the general conditions under s. 524 of the FW Act for stand down.
The threshold requirement to make a stand down direction is that the employee cannot be usefully employed for the employee’s normal days or hours because of changes to business attributable to: (i) the COVID 19 pandemic; or (ii) government initiatives to slow the transmission of COVID 19. This would permit an employer to stand down an employee due to reduced custom as a result of COVID-19 (which may not be permitted under s. 524).
An employee subject to a stand down direction could ask the employer for permission to engage in:
i. reasonable secondary employment;
ii. training; or
iii. professional development.
The employer must consider and not unreasonably refuse such requests.
A qualifying employer is authorised to give the following directions:
An employee must consider and must not unreasonably refuse a request made by a qualifying employer to take paid annual leave, provided the request will not result in the employee having a balance of paid annual leave of less than two weeks.
The employee and qualifying employer can agree that twice as much paid annual leave, at half the employee’s rate of pay, be taken.
During a period when an employee is subject to a direction, the period counts as service.
An employee who is subject to a direction accrues leave entitlements as if the direction had not been given. Any entitlements to redundancy pay and payment in lieu of notice of termination are to be calculated as if the direction had not been given.
The Fair work Commission (FWC) may deal with a dispute about the operation of the amendments by way of mediation or conciliation, or by making a recommendation or expressing an opinion or by binding arbitration.
The COVID-19 situation in Australia is continuously evolving. This update is correct as at 9 April 2020. We encourage you to contact us or visit the FWC website to keep up to speed with the latest developments.
David Cross (Norton Rose Fulbright Employment & Labour Partner) and Shannon Walker (Norton Rose Fulbright Employment & Labour Senior Associate), will be presenting a webinar on the variations to the FW Act resulting from COVID-19 on Wednesday 15 April 2020 at 2.00pm AEST. Please tune in and join David and Shannon for this discussion by clicking here.
Publication
On 24 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that the European Commission’s (the EC) 2009 decision, which imposed a (then record) €1.06 billion fine on Intel, was flawed as far as it found that loyalty rebates granted by Intel had anti-competitive effects.
Publication
The Dutch tax classification system for non-Dutch entities will undergo significant changes as of 1 January 2025.
Publication
In King Crude Carriers SA & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 719 the Court of Appeal held that the claimant sellers (the Sellers) were entitled to claim the deposits promised under sale contracts as a debt despite the defendant buyers’ (the Buyers) breach of contract, which had resulted in the non-fulfilment of a condition precedent to the payment of the deposits.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023