Publication
Avoiding legal and regulatory pitfalls in digital transformation projects
This article first appeared in the September 2024 issue of Financier Worldwide.
Netherlands | Publication | September 2019
On September 17, 2019 – the Dutch government presented its 2020 Budget, including its 2020 Tax Plan (“Belastingplan 2020”). Below we summarise some of the key proposals of the 2020 Tax Plan that should affect international businesses, being (i) newly announced corporation tax rates, (ii) certain tougher anti-abuse provisions and (iii) the new withholding tax on interest and royalties (2021). In addition, we highlight two other recent proposals of law that are relevant for the tax position of such businesses, the implementation laws for EU directives DAC 6 and ATAD 2.
Last year, the Government announced a reduction in the Dutch corporation tax rates (to 16.5 per cent-22.55 per cent in 2020 and ultimately 15 per cent-20.5 per cent by 2021). As part of the current 2020 Tax Plan, however, the reduction in the top rate will be reversed for 2020. For 2021, the reduction of the top rate will be limited to 21.7 per cent (instead of a further reduction to 20.5 per cent). The rate reductions for the lower bracket (application to profits up to € 200,000) will remain intact.
The new corporation tax rate structure will be as follows:
Year | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
Taxable amount up to EUR 200,000 | 19.0% | 16.5% | 15.0% |
Taxable amount from EUR 200,000 | 25.0% | 25.0% | 21.7% |
The State Secretary for Finance had already announced that the Dutch anti-abuse provisions in corporation tax and dividend tax will be amended in the wake of several European Court of Justice (CJEU) judgments1 of February this year. This particularly concerns the conditions to be met by intermediate holding companies with a so-called linking function (schakelfunctie) to show that there are valid business reasons that reflect economic reality.
Although the Government takes the view that in essence the current anti-abuse rules and related substance requirements are in line with the CJEU’s rulings, it currently proposes a further amendment in the function of the substance requirements. These requirements will no longer serve as a safe harbour. Even if the substance requirements are met the Tax Authorities may still seek to counter situations they consider abusive. The proposed changes will affect the function of the substance requirements in the corporation tax, dividend tax and the proposed conditional withholding tax on interest and royalties.
Practically speaking, this change means that the Dutch Tax Authorities could try and challenge for instance the withholding tax exemption that currently applies to dividend distributions by a Dutch intermediate holding company to shareholders in EU Member States and tax treaty countries by proving that this structure is abusive, even if the relevant substance requirements are satisfied.
The existence of a permanent establishment is one of the principal touch points for taxing non-residents. In order to counter abusive situations, it is now proposed to align the domestic interpretation of the permanent establishment (and permanent representative) definition for personal income tax, wage tax and corporation tax with the permanent establishment definition of the relevant tax treaty (including MLI amendments). For non-treaty situations it is proposed to align the definition with the most recent version of the OECD Model Treaty (2017).
As the OECD definition is generally somewhat broader than the current Dutch permanent establishment interpretation, the proposed changes will likely result in more activities of foreign enterprises resulting in taxable presences in the Netherlands through a permanent establishment or permanent representative.
As already announced in the 2019 Tax Plan, the Government is proposing the introduction of a withholding tax of 20.7 per cent (equal to the top corporation tax rate in 2021) on interest and royalty payments to group entities based in EU blacklisted non-cooperative or low-taxing jurisdictions as of January 1, 2021.
The proposal is not formally part of the Tax Plan 2020 but has been published simultaneously and is part of the effort of the Dutch Government to prevent not only tax evasion but also tax avoidance. The proposal seeks to strike a balance between countering tax avoidance in abusive situations and the investment climate by not unnecessarily hindering fund flows.
The conditional withholding tax will only apply in related party situations. For this purpose a related party is an entity receiving a payment that has a “qualifying interest” the entity paying the interest or royalty or vice versa. Qualifying interest means direct or indirect influence on the operational activities of another entity. This will generally be the case if an entity has a controlling interest of more than 50 per cent of the voting rights. An entity with a qualifying interest in both the paying and the receiving entity also qualifies as a related entity. In addition a “cooperating group” of entities as defined in European Court of Justice case law2 could also qualify as holding a qualifying interest.
In line with the recently introduced CFC legislation, low-taxed is defined as a jurisdiction with a statutory corporate income tax rate of less than 9 per cent which rate applies on October 1 of the year preceding the relevant taxation period (for the Dutch withholding tax). A list of low-taxed countries will be published annually by the Dutch Ministry of Finance. Non-cooperative jurisdictions are those jurisdictions qualified as such by the EU.
Interest will be interpreted broadly and include all remuneration received under a loan. A loan will also include similar funding arrangements such as financial lease or hire-purchase arrangements. Royalties have the same meaning as in the OECD Model Tax Treaty. Loans or licences extended on non-at arm’s length terms will first need to be adjusted to their arm’s length terms prior to applying the conditional withholding tax.
The proposal primarily aims to target direct payments of interest or royalties, meaning payments by either Dutch resident entities or by Dutch permanent establishments of non-Dutch entities.
In addition there may be scenarios where, although the direct payment is not made to a low-taxed jurisdiction, indirectly the payment has such a similar effect that it justifies being subject to the conditional withholding tax.
One example is the situation where a non-low-taxed intermediate conduit company has been artificially interposed between the recipient in the low taxed jurisdiction and the Dutch paying entity and such interposition can qualify as being “abusive”. This will be the case if the conduit is interposed with the main purpose or one of the main purposes of preventing the conditional withholding tax in the Netherlands and the conduit company is not the beneficial owner of the payments received. Other examples include payments to (reverse) hybrid entities and a direct payment to a high taxed jurisdiction in which payment is allocated to a permanent establishment of such an entity in a low-taxed jurisdiction.
To the extent a country is a low-taxed jurisdiction but is also a tax treaty country the tax treaty currently prevails (and as such it may prevent the levy of this withholding tax). In order for the proposal to be effective, such tax treaties will need to be renegotiated. It is now proposed that in these situations there will be three year grandfathering period during which the Netherlands will not seek to enforce the withholding tax in order to enable time for treaty negotiations.
Even though the following items are officially not part of the 2020 Tax Plan, we wanted to highlight two other recent proposals of law that are relevant for the tax position of such businesses, being the implantation laws for EU directives DAC 6 and ATAD 2.
The Dutch Government has recently published its proposals to implement both Directives – the implementation law for DAC 6 on July 12, 2019 and the implementation law for ATAD 2 on July 2, 2019. Both proposals still need to be discussed in the Dutch Parliament and the Dutch Senate.
Publication
This article first appeared in the September 2024 issue of Financier Worldwide.
Publication
The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCC Act) received Royal Assent on 24 May 2024 and is generally expected to come into force in autumn this year.
Publication
On 26 July 2024, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) jointly released revised rules in respect of the investments into China’s financial market through the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor and Renminbi Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (collectively, QFII) regime (the New Rules).
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023