Across the globe, businesses are keen to appeal to increasingly ethical consumers by promoting ambitious ESG initiatives. This has led to a flood of “green” claims – such as “sustainable”, “environmentally friendly” and “net carbon zero” – in almost every sector. 

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) recognises the direct impact that environmental claims have on consumers. Customers are willing to pay a premium for more environmentally friendly alternatives. But consumers can find it difficult to verify whether the claims are true or not and can be swayed by inaccurate or exaggerated environmental claims. Businesses can also inadvertently fall into the trap of exaggerating, or not fulling understanding, their own claims in error. Regulators are concerned and watching the market, and therefore businesses, especially in the consumer markets space, must take care so as not to be on the receiving end of an investigation.

 

Caught out? 

It is worth noting that in 2022, the ACCC undertook an internet sweep, which identified that 57 per cent of 247 businesses were making concerning environmental and sustainability claims. Some of those organisations would have been inadvertently making misleading claims, while others may have been actively greenwashing. 

As a result, environmental claims and sustainability remains a key enforcement priority for the ACCC, with the regulator: 

  • updating and publishing its much-anticipated guidance on environmental claims (Greenwashing Guidance) in December 2023;
  • establishing a Sustainability Taskforce within the ACCC so it can upskill; and 
  • taking targeted enforcement action under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
We are now seeing these regulations being applied in practice, including with the ACCC:
  • commencing proceedings in April 2024 against a manufacturer of kitchen and garbage bags for claims its products were made from 50 per cent recycled “ocean plastic” where the claim was combined with wave imagery and the use of blue coloured bags, creating an impression that the products were made from plastic waste collected from the ocean, when that was not the case; and 
  • accepting an undertaking from a yoghurt manufacturer following an investigation into its claim its tubs were made from “100% ocean plastic” in November 2023 because the resin used was collected from coastal areas, but not directly from the ocean, rendering it misleading. 

Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has also been active in this space: 

  • In September 2024, the Federal Court ordered Vanguard Investments Australia to pay a $12.9 million penalty for making misleading claims that it screened its funds to restrict investments from being made in companies with significant business activities in fossil fuels. 
  • The Federal Court found a trustee of the superannuation fund Active Super made a number of misleading representations that it excluded investments that posed too great a risk to the environment and community, when they were not in fact eliminated.  
In September 2024, Ad Standards upheld a complaint about a major supermarket brand, which made the claim “Powered by 100% renewable electricity” on a freezer sticker in-store. The environmental claim was found to be misleading, despite the advertiser holding robust evidence that it – as a company – sources its power from renewable sources. 

 

Why does this matter?

With a number of regulators closely scrutinising environmental claims, the risk profile has increased significantly and is only intensifying. 

  • The ACCC has made it clear it will not hesitate to set a clear precedent where it is likely to have the most impact on consumers and healthy competition and deter other businesses from engaging in similar conduct. We expect to see greater scrutiny and action in the next year. Breaching the ACCC’s Greenwashing Guidance will likely result in a breach of the ACL. With the full range of enforcement measures at its disposal, you should carefully consider your claims to avoid being on the receiving end of enforcement action. 
  • The Australian Association of National Advertisers (AANA) has also recently published a revised Environmental Claims Code (Code), which took effect on 1 March 2025. The new Code:
    • largely aligns the definition of “Environmental Claim” with that in the ACCC’s Greenwashing Guidance;
    • expands its reach to include images and sounds;
    • prohibits broad or vague environmental claims; and 
    • requires advertisers to ensure claims about goals and targets are realistic, achievable and substantiated with robust evidence. 
Remember the Code applies to any materials deemed advertising. Essentially, any materials a business puts out on its website, through social media channels, or in other materials (such as a business’ sustainability, community and social responsibility statements) will be caught by that definition. The Code does not only apply to traditional, formal print or digital paid advertisements. 

Complaints that green claims do not comply with the Code can be made to Ad Standards where it may be assessed by the Community Panel. We are seeing this avenue used by community activist groups to create additional adverse PR for businesses, and potentially to find information they can then use with further complaints before the ACCC or ASIC. If a complaint is upheld, a case report is made available to the general public, and although the AANA codes are voluntary, its reach and the negative PR associated with any breaches invariably results in the advertiser changing or removing the non-compliant advertisement. In addition to the negative PR, this takes up business time and incurs costs. 
 
  • ASIC has announced its enforcement priorities for 2025, listing greenwashing and misleading conduct involving ESG claims among them. It has also published an information sheet on avoiding greenwashing when promoting sustainability-related products, nodding to ASIC’s commitment in this space. 
  • We are also waiting for the Senate to report on its inquiry into greenwashing, expected to be published on 28 March 2025. Along with the greenwashing claims made in certain industries (such as energy, vehicles, household products and appliances, food and drink packaging, cosmetics, clothing and footwear), the impact of these claims on consumers and other topics, the Senate is considering legislative options to tackle greenwashing. 

 

What you can do?

We would be very happy to help your business ensure its environmental claims are compliant. Please reach out to a member of our team if you would like to discuss how you can frame your business’ green credentials or if you would like tailored training on this topic. 

In the meantime, here are some practical tips to keep in mind when preparing claims: 

  • Do spend the time scrutinising your environmental claims to ensure they are genuine and accurate 
  • Do avoid using broad, unsubstantiated statements such as “sustainable”, “environmentally responsible” or “eco-friendly” 
  • Do include appropriate qualifications for terms consumers tend to be less familiar with (e.g. “net zero”, “renewable” and “recyclable)
  • Do ensure supporting evidence is independent, transparent, reputable and robust and do not make claims that go beyond this evidence
  • Do not discount the impact of accompanying imagery, audio and copy on the overall impression made on consumers
  • Do differentiate between claims based on offsetting and claims based on emission reduction
  • Do not make future claims (e.g. about “carbon neutral” targets) unless you have reasonable grounds to do so and you have a plan setting out your goals and how progress will be measured against milestones
  • Do consider the whole lifecycle of a business, product or service. If your claim only pertains to a particular part of that lifecycle, do make that clear in the claim itself
  • Do not cherry-pick environmental benefits which are insignificant when the business, product or service is considered holistically or simply advertise the observance of existing law (unless this is made clear)
  • Do take especial care with certification marks and do not imply you have been endorsed or certified when you have not been
  • Do limit exposure to the risk by updating your claims clearance process and conducting internal training 


Contact

Partner

Recent publications

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .