Publication
Distress signals: Cooperation agreements or mergers to the rescue in times of crisis?
The current volatile and unpredictable economic climate creates challenges for businesses.
United States | Publication | June 4, 2021
A former employee filed suit against Rite Aid and a supervisor in 2008 for wrongful termination. After a trial, and two retrials following subsequent appeals, a California Court of Appeals largely affirmed the jury's US$6M verdict against the defendants. On appeal, Rite Aid contended that interim earnings of the plaintiff should be deducted from the past economic damages award. The Court of Appeals agreed, rejecting plaintiff's argument that the interim earnings should not be an offset because the job she took after her termination was not substantially similar to the one she held at Rite Aid.
An employer can prove that a former employee failed to mitigate damages caused by termination by showing that plaintiff failed to make a reasonable effort to search for other work or that plaintiff turned down offers of comparable employment. The duty to mitigate damages is separate than the question whether actual interim earnings should be deducted from an economic damages award. The Court of Appeals held that the amount actually earned from other employment must offset the damages award, and reduced the jury's verdict by more than US$140,000. Surprisingly, the court's decision creates a conflict in the lower courts which the California Supreme Court may be asked to resolve.
Publication
The current volatile and unpredictable economic climate creates challenges for businesses.
Publication
On April 17, the Office of the United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) released its Notice of Action and Proposed Action in Section 301 Investigation of China’s Targeting the Maritime, Logistics and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance, Request for Comments (the Notice).
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025