The fall-out from the COVID-19 pandemic aggravated what the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (the OECD) described as market failures1 in which the private sector has been hesitant to provide insurance cover for low and middle income countries.

Under the Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits (the Arrangement), first enacted in 1978 and most recently updated in 2023, export finance transactions must feature a downpayment of 15%. To counter these perceived constraints and as part of a broader modernisation package2, this down payment was reduced from 15% to 5% in 2021 through a Common Line agreement, CL-XCR 2/2021. As of 12 December 2023, and following agreement between Participants3, the OECD extended this Common Line agreement until 13 December 2024 (CL-XCR-02-2023, the Common Line agreement).

This memorandum will set out the provision on down payments in the Arrangement, before explaining how the Common Line agreement modifies this.

The arrangement

The general rule is that, where goods and services are the subject of official support, purchasers are required to make down payments equating to at least 15% of the export contract value at or before the start of the credit line. 

(a) Calculation of overall export contract value

To establish when the credit line begins, it is necessary to consult the conditions for the relevant grouping as defined in Annex XIII:

(i) Parts or components (intermediate goods) including related services;

(ii) Quasi-capital goods, including related services – machinery or equipment, generally of relatively low unit value, intended to be used in an industrial process or for productive or commercial use;

(iii) Capital goods and project services – machinery or equipment of high value intended to be used in an industrial process or for productive or commercial use; or
(iv) Complete plants or factories – complete productive units of high value requiring the use of capital goods.

(b) Applying reductions

It is worth noting that the export contract value can be proportionally reduced in cases where the transaction includes goods and services from a third country that does not fall within the remit of official support.  This, in turn, can proportionally reduce the down payment amount4.

(c) Official support parameters

It is possible to finance and/or insure 100% of the premium and it may or may not be included in the value of the export contract itself.  Official support for downpayments covered in the Arrangement must only take the form of insurance or guarantee against usual pre-credit risks.

Official support may be provided by Participants for local costs where: 

(i) The maximum amount of official support for local costs shall not exceed: 

(A) for Category I countries, 40% of the export contract value. 

(B) for Category II countries, 50% of the export contract value5.

(ii) Official support for local costs shall not be provided on terms more favourable/less restrictive than those agreed for the related exports.

(iii) Where official support for local costs exceeds 15% of the export contract value, such official support shall be subject to prior notification, pursuant to Article 446, specifying the nature of the local costs being supported.

Outside of the down payment parameters of the Arrangement, Participants are not able to provide official support in excess of 85% of the export contract value (taking into account third country supply but excluding local costs). 

The Common Line Agreement

Under Article 59 of the Arrangement, its terms can be adjusted through Common Line agreements for a period of two years at a time. Common Lines are understandings between Participants to agree specific financial terms and conditions for official support.  Once agreed, a Common Line supersedes the Arrangement as per the use-case specified in the Common Line. 

The Common Line agreement in question (CL-XCR-02-2023) reduces the downpayment rate specified above to 5%.  This reduction is only available for sovereign buyers in Category II countries7 that have a country risk category of 5-7 (inclusive).  Country risk categories correspond to likelihood of whether the country will be able to service their external debts (as per Article 22). 

(a) Country Risk Assessment Methodology

The rating is applied through a two-step methodology:

Step One – Quantitative

First, a quantitative model – the Country Risk Assessment Model (CRAM) – assesses each country on three risk indicators: 

(i) payment experience reported by the Participants,

(ii) the financial situation based on IMF indicators, and

(iii) the economic situation based primarily on IMF indicators. 

Step Two – Qualitative

Country risk experts from OECD members produce a qualitative assessment in order to capture factors that are not included in the CRAM.  Changes to the CRAM brought about by this qualitative assessment must be approved by a consensus of the country risk experts. 

This is an evolving list, and the Arrangement requires that this list is made publicly available8.  Additionally, a guarantee from the ministry of finance or central bank must be obtained. 

(b) Implications

This renewal of the downpayment Common Line amendment first put in place in 2021 will now run until 13 December 2024.  This means that ECAs will be able to continue offering a significant coverage on export contracts of up to 95% as opposed to the 85% envisaged in the original Arrangement. 

 

Footnotes

1   OECD’s report on policy responses to the pandemic, “Tax and fiscal policies after the COVID-19 crisis (oecd.org)”.

2   The OECD released a ‘Participants’ Statement’ announcing the modernisation of the Arrangement on 3 April 2023, “Participants Statement (3 April 2023).pdf (oecd.org)”.

3   Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.

4   Retention payments made after the start of the credit are not factored into the down payment for the purposes of this calculation.

5   Under Article 10 of the Arrangement, Category I countries are High Income OECD Countries as defined by the World Bank. All countries not in this definition are deemed Category II.

6    Article 44 establishes the parameters under which a Participant must provide prior notification to all other Participants before issuing certain commitments for credit.

7   All countries not in this definition are deemed Category II.

8   For both prevailing and historic country risk classification tables, consult the Country risk classification’ page on the OECD’s public website, “Country risk classification - OECD”.



Practice areas:

Recent publications

Publication

Ireland

On 31 October 2023, the Screening of Third Country Transactions Act 2023 (the “Act”), which establishes a new foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime in Ireland, was enacted.

Global | November 13, 2024

Antitrust and competition

Publication

Regulation 1/2003 2.0 – What to expect for a revised procedural antitrust framework under a new European Commission?

The European Commission (EC) is contemplating a revision of the procedural framework for antitrust investigations that is laid down in Regulation 1/2003 and Regulation 773/2004 (together, the “Regulations”).

Global | November 11, 2024

Antitrust and competition

Publication

Emerging Recognition of “Without Prejudice” in UAE Law: Recent Developments

The concept of “without prejudice” (WP) is well-established in common law jurisdictions and protects statements, offers, or admissions made during settlement negotiations from being used as evidence in court if the negotiations fail.

Middle East | November 06, 2024

Litigation and disputes
Site search

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .

Register now