Author:
Global | Publication | September 2024
As we discussed in our recent article,1 2024 was expected to be a make or break year for the global hydrogen industry.
Fortescue’s recent announcement that it proposes to scale back its green hydrogen project, among a number of other projects that have been delayed, shelved or shifted focus, has highlighted the challenges and increased some of the negative noise around the technology.2
It also comes at a time when a number of countries, notably Japan, have pivoted the focus of their decarbonisation efforts to other technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) and green ammonia, each of which are perceived to have more near-term benefits.3
In this update we provide some commentary on the critical challenges to the future of the hydrogen industry in Australia. In addition to some of the structural commercial issues, a clear theme is the attraction of capital into the Australian market. The creation of viable projects in the near term will be heavily reliant on government policies, including Australian state and federal policies and also the policies of jurisdictions expected to be significant offtakers of low carbon hydrogen produced in Australia and jurisdictions competing with Australia to attract capital for projects.
In this respect, developers are actively comparing the availability and breadth of government support across jurisdictions. A brief table summarising the different policies of key jurisdictions is included at the end of this update.
In announcing the pause on its green hydrogen ambitions, Fortescue specifically called out the high cost of electricity.
The price of renewable energy is expected to contribute approximately A$3.30 of the forecast A$5.86 per kilogram production cost of green hydrogen in 2025.4 This compares to about A$2.27-2.77 per kilogram for fossil fuel generated hydrogen.5 This difference is the largest contributor to what is often called the “green premium” for green hydrogen.
Current forecasts do not show substantial drops in electricity prices in the short to medium term, given expected demand increases and the costs of transforming to a renewable dominated grid.6
Access to cheap renewable energy is therefore critical to the economic viability of green hydrogen production. Electricity costs can be reduced materially for some projects that are able to have co-located dedicated renewable generation. This will not be available for all projects.
Reducing costs for grid connected projects (and “greening” the grid to enable grid generated electricity to meet green hydrogen certification standards more easily) will require continued investment in renewable generation, firming and transmission infrastructure.
Current Australian Government policies are supportive of this. Most important are:
Federal policies are supported by a range of state-based policies, particularly the development of renewable zones in New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria.
In the absence of significant downward pressure on renewable electricity prices, there are potentially other mechanisms to reduce the “green premium”, such as carbon taxes (both domestically and through carbon border adjustment mechanisms as was recently introduced by the European Union). Government subsidies are also likely to be helpful as discussed below.
Establishing the best use case for green hydrogen is a question that is yet to be clearly answered in the Australian context.
Hopes that hydrogen will be “the next LNG” seem unlikely to be realised in the foreseeable future given the prohibitive economic and technology constraints on transporting hydrogen. For example, a recent study found the costs of exporting green hydrogen from Australia to South Korea, which are currently A$30 per kilogram, will only fall to A$18 per kilogram by 2050.9
Transporting hydrogen by converting it to ammonia (which can then be cracked back into hydrogen) is generally seen as the short-term solution to transporting the hydrogen molecule given the existing export transport infrastructure however, we have also seen investment into alternative hydrogen carriers such as LOHC (Liquid organic hydrogen carriers), e-methane (currently being investigated in Australia by a consortium of Japanese energy companies) and MOFs (metal-organic framework). A balance of costs, new infrastructure and technology risk needs to be considered in the context of transportation (particularly to northern Asia where the greatest demand is anticipated).
In the shorter term, it is expected that most use cases will be domestic and will likely require the use of the hydrogen at or close to its point of production, to avoid the issue (and costs) of transportation.
The most likely short-term use cases are therefore likely to be industrial use cases connected with commodities currently produced in Australia such as ammonia and iron. This is the clear intent of the Future Made in Australia government policy as discussed below.
The Future Made in Australia program establishes a A$22 billion framework for Australian Government support for the growth of the green hydrogen sector as one of five priority industries.10
The 2024 Federal Budget announced:11
However, the Future Made in Australia program is yet to legislated. It is currently before Parliament and subject to an inquiry by the Senate Economics Legislation Committee.12 On 11 September 2024, the second reading was moved in the Senate.
While there is likely a pathway for the legislation to be passed through Parliament, whether the subsidies would survive a change in government following the federal election due in May 2025 is less certain.
A key milestone achieved since our previous article has been the passing of the Hydrogen Society Promotion Act by the Japanese Parliament on 17 May 2024, which establishes Japan’s supply side support mechanism. See our June 2024 paper described the scheme here.
The core of this is a United Kingdom style contracts for difference (CfD) scheme. Under the CfD scheme suppliers will be paid a difference payment covering the additional cost of low carbon fuels as compared to an index representing the landed cost of conventional fuels in Japan.
Importantly, the CfD subsidies will potentially be accessible by both domestic and foreign low carbon fuel producers including Australia. Interestingly, in the context of transportation, the Japanese government has provided its subsidies by reference to the carbon intensity of the transport medium and specifically references hydrogen, ammonia, e-fuels and e-methane as the anticipated carrier mediums to get hydrogen to Japan.
The Japanese Government has also recently confirmed that there will be no restrictions on international clean hydrogen developers “doubling up” on subsidies between Australian and Japan.
Similarly, South Korea has announced the world’s first clean hydrogen auction. The 15-year auction scheme enables prospective hydrogen and hydrogen derivative developers and producers to bid for government contracts to support their projects (subject to the projects commencing operation by 2028).13
Both the Japanese and Korean schemes potentially allow developers to “stack” subsidies by taking advantage of schemes in multiple jurisdictions. The ability to do so is likely to be critical to early mover project economics.
Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and Japan have all announced policies to support the growth of green and low carbon hydrogen industries.
A comparative table of the regimes is set out at the end of this article. There are several key commonalities and differences between the schemes, particularly:
Feedback from potential investors in the Australian hydrogen sector is that the wider scope of potentially subsidised projects beyond those producing green hydrogen (as well as the sheer scale of the incentives) is potentially driving capital to the United States in particular.
Some of the enthusiasm for hydrogen as the critical agent of the energy transformation has been drained as the economic and technology challenges have become clear. Despite this a number of smaller scale trial projects are moving to Final Investment Decision (FID).
There is a clear opportunity to build on Australia’s comparative advantages in both renewable generation and as a commodity producer, to use green hydrogen to build sustainable export industries in commodities such as ammonia and green iron that are otherwise difficult to abate.
It is clear that this will require very significant government support; analogous to the support received in the early years of development of the LNG industry. The Future Made in Australia initiatives are a start and broadly reflect the design of subsidies in other jurisdictions, although the scope of eligible projects is narrower than in some jurisdictions, particularly the United States.
While these initiatives are material in the Australian budgetary context, in a global investment environment where investors are actively comparing jurisdictions and their relative subsidies, it is unclear whether they are sufficient to attract the capital required to develop projects at the necessary scale. We expect that subsidy stacking is likely to be required for early mover projects. The introduction of schemes in other jurisdictions such as Japan which specifically allow this is an important development.
In the drive to net zero by 2050 policy very much matters.
| Policy | Description | Subsidies / Funding | Hydrogen Type Criteria | |
| AUS | Hydrogen Headstart14 | A$4 billion revenue support for large scale renewable competitive hydrogen production contracts. |
Funding is provided as a grant, in the form of a production credit. The credit will be paid per unit of eligible hydrogen or derivative production. This production credit covers the additional amount required to bridge the difference between the expected sale prices to offtakers and the cost of production (including a justifiable return on capital). |
Green hydrogen Hydrogen must be produced using 100% renewable energy sources and the entire production process must use electrolysis. All end uses of hydrogen or hydrogen derivatives are eligible. |
| Hydrogen Production Tax Incentive (Future Made in Australia)15 |
A$6.7 billion commitment to establish refundable offset for green hydrogen producers. |
A$2 / kg tax credit for renewable hydrogen, available for up to 10 years. Projects must reach FID by 2030. |
Green hydrogen | |
| US | Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit16 | Federal tax credit for clean hydrogen production. | US$3 / kg tax credit. | Low Carbon hydrogen (ie does not produce more than 4 kg of CO2 per kg of hydrogen). |
| Hydrogen Hubs and Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs Programs (Bipartisan Infrastructure Law)17 | Funding for the establishment of hydrogen and clean hydrogen hubs (H2Hubs) across America. |
US$7 billion in total funding. |
Hydrogen Hubs: All hydrogen types Clean Hydrogen Hubs: Clean hydrogen |
|
| UK | Net Zero Hydrogen Fund18 | Fund to subsidise CAPEX and DEVEX expenditure for clean hydrogen production. | £240 million in total funding. | Low carbon hydrogen (meeting the Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard). |
| Hydrogen Allocation Rounds (HARs) (Hydrogen Production Business Model)19 | Allocation of revenue support to hydrogen production facilities under bespoke Front End Agreements and standard form Low Carbon Hydrogen Agreements. | HAR1: £2 billion in subsidies to 11 projects (£241 / MWh over 15 years once operational). | Low carbon hydrogen (meeting the Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard). | |
| EU | European Hydrogen Bank20 | Funding support to hydrogen projects via competitive bidding “Hydrogen Bank Auctions”. | First Hydrogen Bank Auction (2024): €720 million in funding awarded to 7 projects. | Green hydrogen |
| Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs)21 | Public funding for clean hydrogen projects recognized as IPCEIs to cover cost gaps and risks. |
Hy2Tech: €5.4 billion Hy2Use: €5.2 billion HY2Infra: €6.9 billion Hy2Move: €1.4 billion |
Clean hydrogen | |
| Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) for clean energy and Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs)22 | Post-COVID-19 facility supporting development and clean hydrogen projects and value chains, including for hydrogen IPCEIs. | Approx. €13.6 billion | Green hydrogen and low carbon hydrogen | |
| Japan | CfD Scheme (Hydrogen Society Act) | Supply-side subsidy scheme using contracts for differences (CfD) to close price gap between sourcing low carbon hydrogen and conventional fuels. | Subsidies vary from project to project. | Hydrogen, ammonia, e-fuels and e-Methane |
| Clusters Support Scheme | Identifying hard-to-abate industries and developing industrial clusters, i.e. hydrogen infrastructure through a concentration of grant funding for the use of low carbon fuels. | To be confirmed. | Hydrogen, ammonia, e-fuels and e-Methane | |
| Korea | Clean hydrogen power generation market |
Korea Power Exchange opened the clean hydrogen power generation market by releasing the “2024 Competitive Bidding for the Clean Hydrogen Power Generation Market”. This is the world’s first established bidding market for power generation utilising clean hydrogen. |
N/A | Clean hydrogen |
Publication
On 24 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that the European Commission’s (the EC) 2009 decision, which imposed a (then record) €1.06 billion fine on Intel, was flawed as far as it found that loyalty rebates granted by Intel had anti-competitive effects.
Publication
The Dutch tax classification system for non-Dutch entities will undergo significant changes as of 1 January 2025.
Publication
In King Crude Carriers SA & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 719 the Court of Appeal held that the claimant sellers (the Sellers) were entitled to claim the deposits promised under sale contracts as a debt despite the defendant buyers’ (the Buyers) breach of contract, which had resulted in the non-fulfilment of a condition precedent to the payment of the deposits.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023
