The ELTIF 2.0 Regulation, amending current ELTIF Regulation (EU) 2015/760, was published in the EU’s Official Journal on 20 March 2023 (ELTIF 2). Please see L_2023080EN.01000101.xml (europa.eu).

ELTIF 2 will enter into force on 9 April 2023 and will apply from 10 January 2024.

ELTIFs, which are currently authorized must comply with the ELTIF 2 regime by 11 January 2029, unless they are not raising additional capital.

New ELTIFs authorized before 10 January 2024 may choose to be established under the ELTIF 2 regime.

The ELTIF 2 regime brings new attractive possibilities for this investment product, such as:

  • Clarified and simplified scope of eligible assets and investments, portfolio composition and diversification requirements;
  • Better alignment with other applicable regulations; and
  • Dual regime with varying levels of restrictions and constraints depending on the qualification of the targeted investors.

Please contact us for additional information on the topic.



Contacts

Claire Guilbert
Claire Guilbert
Partner
Email
claire.guilbert@nortonrosefulbright.com
T: +352 621 747 650
Geoffroy Hermanns
Geoffroy Hermanns
Partner
Email
geoffroy.hermanns@nortonrosefulbright.com
T: +352 (28) 5739805

Industry:

Practice area:

Recent publications

Restructuring touchpoint blog image

Publication

Intel judgment - more than one way to skin a rebate?!

On 24 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that the European Commission’s (the EC) 2009 decision, which imposed a (then record) €1.06 billion fine on Intel, was flawed as far as it found that loyalty rebates granted by Intel had anti-competitive effects.

Global | December 19, 2024

Antitrust and competition
Rio

Publication

The 2025 Dutch tax classification of the Brazilian FIP

The Dutch tax classification system for non-Dutch entities will undergo significant changes as of 1 January 2025.

Global | December 19, 2024

Tax
Vessel at a dock loading containers

Publication

Paying the Price: Court of Appeal holds debt still due when non-fulfilment of a condition precedent is caused by the buyer’s own breach

In King Crude Carriers SA & Ors v Ridgebury November LLC & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 719 the Court of Appeal held that the claimant sellers (the Sellers) were entitled to claim the deposits promised under sale contracts as a debt despite the defendant buyers’ (the Buyers) breach of contract, which had resulted in the non-fulfilment of a condition precedent to the payment of the deposits.

Global | December 18, 2024

Shipping
Site search

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .

Register now