Publication
Mission impossible? Teresa Ribera’s mission letter and the future of EU merger review
Executive Vice President Vestager’s momentous tenure as Commissioner responsible for EU competition policy is nearing its end.
United Kingdom | Update | March 2020
Across the Republic of Ireland, schools, pre-schools and higher education settings have been closed from 12 March for a period until 29 March 2020, to support efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19. It is likely, given the announcement by the UK Government that it is moving to the delay phase of managing the spread of the virus, that similar action will be taken in the UK in the coming weeks and that such action may not be limited to the education sector, with healthcare and aged care also likely to be affected. Other projects are also likely to be impacted as social distancing increases.
With increased concern around the impact of COVID-19, PPP project companies and sponsors need to consider the implications for their rights and obligations under the project agreements to which they are party. The current situation with COVID-19 in the UK is fast moving and we cannot predict what measures will be imposed as Authorities seek to address the risk, but we flag below some questions we’ve been considering this week. Our responses are based on the standard drafting in SOPC and PF2-based project agreements.
Where there has been no specific action taken or instruction given by the authority but the services cannot be provided as required because, for example, staff are taken ill or are told to self-isolate then relief is unlikely to be granted for any unavailability or service performance failures which arise as a result.
The standard definition of force majeure events in SOPC or PF2-based project agreements does not extend to this type of event.
A COVID-19-related shut-down or service failure is unlikely to constitute an emergency under the project agreement, given that this definition is intended to apply to a short-term emergency, requiring mobilisation of emergency services.
Depending on the sector and any action taken by the authority, protection may be available under the provisions relating to compensation events, authority step-in, relief events or excusing provisions in the payment mechanism. Change in law may also be relevant depending on project agreement terms and steps taken by the UK Government.
If deductions are made as a result of service performance failure or unavailability and no protection is available, this will have an impact on a project company’s ability to meet scheduled debt repayments under their financing arrangements. The market is alert to this issue and we expect borrowers and lenders to work together to agree a sensible approach.
For demand-based projects we might expect significant impact on footfall on roads and transport systems as people are encouraged to work from home or if European models of entire city lockdown is followed. All project stakeholders will be concerned to manage the cashflow implications of a sudden and prolonged drop in project revenues.
The immediate subcontracts usually contain similar back–to-back provisions to the SOPC contract however, supply chain contractors lower down the chain may have the more usual commercial force majeure protections in their contracts. Project companies and their immediate subcontractors may need to prepare to deal with the non-performance of their suppliers in the near- or medium-term as the financial effects of the current circumstances are felt by the economy.
The usual “required insurances” on SOPC projects are unlikely to respond to claims related to personnel not being available to perform the services. However, policies should be reviewed and insurance advisers consulted.
Publication
Executive Vice President Vestager’s momentous tenure as Commissioner responsible for EU competition policy is nearing its end.
Publication
On 10 October 2024, the UK government published its long awaited response (the Response) to its January 2024 consultation on “Designing a policy framework to enable investment in long duration electricity storage” (the Consultation).
Publication
Miranda Cole, Julien Haverals and Emma Clarke of our Brussels/ London offices are the authors of a chapter on procedural issues in merger control that has been published in the third edition of the Global Competition Review’s The Guide to Life Sciences. This covers a number of significant procedural developments that have affected merger review of life sciences transactions.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023