Publication
Mission impossible? Teresa Ribera’s mission letter and the future of EU merger review
Executive Vice President Vestager’s momentous tenure as Commissioner responsible for EU competition policy is nearing its end.
Author:
Global | Publication | December 2023
It has been said that even if existing pledges and national targets for reducing emissions are achieved, the reduction won't be sufficient enough to limit the increase in temperature to 1.5 degrees. Anything above this, scientists believe, will cause irreversible devastation.
Contributing to these emissions are unsustainable waste management policies across the globe. According to the OECD, plastic production has doubled in the last 20 years, with a total of 460 million tonnes produced in 2019 alone. Of this, less than 10% is recycled, and it is estimated that plastic production will account for up to 20% of the global carbon budget by 2040.
So how can transitioning to a circular economy help tackle the climate crisis?
The circular economy has a key role to play in reducing global greenhouse gas emissions by minimising those which stem from material extraction and used in various sectors, not only those limited to plastic production. By targeting unsustainable practices in key industry sectors such as construction and agriculture, circular economy strategies can potentially cut 40% of emissions by 2050. The demand for raw materials and new products is reduced, and this in turn helps reduce the global emissions that come from the extraction and processing of materials.
Although it is critical to focus on energy efficiency and renewable energy, achieving net-zero requires a fundamental shift in how we produce and use products, materials, and food. For example:
There are a number of policies, programmes and legislation in place in South Africa which promote development of a circular economy. This is supported by the recognition of the waste management hierarchy under the National Environmental Management: Waste Act, which is given effect through the National Waste Management Strategy (NWMS).
The regulatory developments in the South African waste management framework reflect a shift in focus from landfill management to recycling, reuse and recovery. This is in line with global trends in waste management which indicate a shift from waste management solutions that entail “end of pipe” methodologies (primarily landfilling) to a circular economy approach, recognising that many waste streams are resources rather than waste.
In order to achieve a circular economy, one of the key principles which must be implemented is “extended producer responsibility”. Therefore, a key part of South Africa’s waste management framework is the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations, which provide for the financial and/or physical responsibility of producers across various supply chains to ensure the sustainable treatment and disposal of post-consumer products. The goal is to create accountability for the environmental impacts of these products, and thereby promote waste minimisation.
The EPR Regulations have only been in place for little more than two years, making it too early to begin drawing definitive conclusions, but there are certainly early signs for optimism. In that time, the regulations have:
The EPR Regulations (through EPR schemes) provide for private sector collaboration, which is crucial in order to reach the waste minimisation targets under the NWMS.
However, there are challenges to implementation of waste minimisation policies, as recently noted by the South African Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Barbara Creecy in relation to the development of a UN treaty on ending plastic pollution. Minister Creecy stated that, while South Africa recognises "the threat plastic pollution poses to human health, ecosystem functioning and the marine environment", there are a number of just transition considerations which need to be taken into account when implementing plastic reduction legislation. Foremost of these issues is the plastic industry itself, which sustains an estimated 60,000 jobs. The Minister also cited South Africa's role as a developing country and the access to adequate and reliable financial resources as other potential hurdles.
Underappreciated contributors to the cause of waste minimisation and the implementation of a circular economy are informal waste reclaimers. Reclaimers are individuals who collect re-usable and recyclable materials from residential and commercial waste bins, landfill sites and open spaces in order to revalue them and generate an income. They act as an important bridge between the municipal service chain and the formal private sector value chain in developing countries, helping to move ‘waste’ from the roadside and landfills into the recycling economy. Reclaimers make a significant contribution to formal waste management and recycling systems by reducing any leakage from products, sustaining local recycling economies and extending the life span of landfill sites.
The achievements of these marginalised members of society cannot be understated.
Despite this, their contributions to sustainability have historically not received the acknowledgement they deserve. Informal reclaimers have, until the promulgation of the EPR regulations, typically not been paid for the collection service they provide. Formalising their role is a first step towards providing waste pickers with much needed support, and this would promote the objectives of fairness, justice and inclusivity - something that was emphasised during COP26 in Glasgow two years ago and has been re-emphasised in South Africa’s own Just Energy Implementation Plan.
Although there has been significant progress made in recognising the role of waste reclaimers, other jurisdictions have shown that effective integration can be expedited by implementing additional measures at a municipal level, such as:
To successfully build an inclusive circular economy, it is clear that reclaimers need to be recognised as key stakeholders that contribute significantly, not only to the collection and recycling of post-consumer material but also to alleviating socio-economic challenges in African cities. This includes:
In order to achieve a circular economy, South Africa must continue to implement the promising policy initiatives which have been developed in recent years and draw on international best practice in working towards a sustainable future, while focusing on putting the nature, people, lives, and livelihoods at the forefront of the battle against climate change.
For South Africa, the transition to a circular economy needs to promote a sustainable and resilient socio-economic transformation, while also promoting opportunities for the most vulnerable people in our communities. For our cities to attain a sustainable and just inclusive circular economy, specific considerations should be given to adopting practices that are rooted in or have benefited local context.
Publication
Executive Vice President Vestager’s momentous tenure as Commissioner responsible for EU competition policy is nearing its end.
Publication
On 10 October 2024, the UK government published its long awaited response (the Response) to its January 2024 consultation on “Designing a policy framework to enable investment in long duration electricity storage” (the Consultation).
Publication
Miranda Cole, Julien Haverals and Emma Clarke of our Brussels/ London offices are the authors of a chapter on procedural issues in merger control that has been published in the third edition of the Global Competition Review’s The Guide to Life Sciences. This covers a number of significant procedural developments that have affected merger review of life sciences transactions.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023