Publication
Global rules on foreign direct investment (FDI)
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Global | Publication | June 2018
Serving a notice is a risky business and getting it wrong can prove very expensive – even if the error seems inconsequential.
In Ropermaker Properties Limited v Bella Italia Restaurants Limited [2018] EWHC (1002), a landlord entered into a conditional agreement with a prospective tenant and its guarantor for the grant of a lease of a unit in a new development. The tenant and guarantor were sister companies.
The agreement provided that if certain conditions were not satisfied by a long-stop date; “the Landlord or the Tenant may at any time…..give written notice to the other and the Guarantor to determine this Agreement”.
The notice was required to be delivered personally, or sent by prepaid first class post, special delivery or by commercial courier to each party required to receive the notice. A notice sent by email was to be treated as invalid.
The long-stop date passed and the tenant sent written notice to the landlord purporting to exercise its right to determine the agreement. No equivalent notice was sent to the guarantor, but it did receive an email with a copy of the notice served on the landlord.
The landlord argued that the tenant had not terminated the agreement as it had not fully complied with the notice requirements.
The court agreed. What is more, the conditions in the agreement had by now either been satisfied or waived, so that it was unconditional and the tenant was bound to take a lease that it no longer wanted.
The judge admitted that “in reaching this conclusion, I am conscious that non-service of a hard copy of a separate notice on [the guarantor] as sister company of [the tenant]...…is a very technical and unattractive basis on which to invalidate that notice”. However, the agreement required a notice given by the tenant to be given to the guarantor as well as to the landlord, and the unilateral right to determine the agreement required compliance with the terms of the agreement, so that any failure to comply invalidated the notice. “It makes no difference that the requirements were substantially complied with or had no apparent purpose or benefit”.
The choppy waters of serving notices are notoriously difficult to navigate. The only way to reach the shore safely is strictly to comply with contractual (and statutory) formalities, even if they appear to be pointless.
Publication
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Publication
On February 2, 2024, the Belgian Presidency of the Council of the European Union confirmed that the Committee of Permanent Representatives had signed the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Regulation, referred to as the AI Act. Approval by the EU Parliament followed on 13 March 2024, and the AI Act is likely to appear in the EU’s Official Journal around May 2024. The AI Act aims to establish a stringent legal framework governing the development, marketing, and utilisation of artificial intelligence within the region, thereby marking a significant advancement in the regulation of this burgeoning domain.
Publication
The private credit market and direct lending have grown and diversified immensely in the past decade, offering alternative sources and terms of debt compared to those historically provided by the syndicated leveraged loan and public issuance markets. Consequently, they are fast becoming pivotal components in the capital ecosystem, so much so that the Bank of England consider that the private credit market is currently responsible for approximately $1.8 trillion of debt issuance, which is four times its size in 2015. This growth has been particularly pronounced in Europe and the US but there has also been significant activity in Asia.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023