United Kingdom | Publication | September 2020
On September 4, 2020 the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published its latest Quarterly Consultation which includes changes to Chapter 8 of the Listing Rules to align provisions there with provisions for “exempted documents” under the Prospectus Regulation.
When the Prospectus Regulation replaced the Prospectus Directive in July 2019, the FCA replaced the Prospectus Rules sourcebook with the Prospectus Regulation sourcebook and made other consequential changes to the Listing Rules, including amending references to “equivalent documents” with references to exempted documents in line with language in the Prospectus Regulation. However, the FCA has realised that LR 8.4.9R(1)(b), LR 8.4.3R(1)(b) and LR 8.4.3R(4), which concern the role of sponsors in relation to transactions by companies with a premium listing, were not amended and so amendments are now proposed to align these Listing Rules with the previous changes made under the Prospectus Regulation.
The draft Instrument setting out these changes includes two annexes. The first makes changes that will apply while the UK remains in a transition period following its exit from the EU, which is due to end on December 31, 2020. The second makes changes to apply from January 1, 2021, when EU law will no longer apply in the UK and instead EU legislation will be converted into UK law. Both are drafted on the basis that the amendments to LR 8.4.3R and LR 8.4.9R proposed in the Exiting the European Union Handbook (Amendments) Instrument, as consulted on in CP19/27, are not to be made.
Comments are requested by November 4, 2020.
On September 9, 2020, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published a final notice publicly censuring Conor Foley, the former CEO of Worldspreads Group, for market abuse (dissemination, manipulating transactions and false or misleading impressions) and banning him from performing any roles linked to regulated activity.
On July 3, 2020, the FCA published a Decision Notice that had also imposed a financial penalty of £658,900 on the former CEO, to which he subsequently provided evidence of his serious financial hardship. The FCA has therefore imposed a public censure in lieu of the financial penalty and the former CEO has withdrawn a reference to the Upper Tribunal seeking to review the Decision Notice.
(FCA, Market abuse: FCA final notice for false or misleading impression – press release, 09.09.2020)
(FCA: Market abuse: FCA final notice for Conor Foley, 07.09.2020)
On September 10, 2020, the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) Financial Reporting Lab published an invitation to investors and companies to participate in a new project on corporate disclosures on risks, uncertainties and scenarios.
The FRC’s Financial Reporting Lab states that the scope of the project is likely to:
The FRC’s Financial Reporting Lab invites investors, companies and other interested parties to communicate their interest in participating by emailing FinancialReportingLab@frc.org.uk and expects to publish its findings in 2021.
On September 10, 2020, Companies House resumed its voluntary strike off process, following its temporary suspension introduced in March 2020 in light of COVID-19.
All companies that applied to be struck off before July 2020 will, therefore, be struck off the register in a phased approach over the next four weeks starting on September 10, 2020.
For those companies that applied to be struck off from July 2020 onwards, the voluntary strike off process will continue as normal after this initial four-week period.
The compulsory strike off process will resume on October 10, 2020.
(Companies House: Companies House resumes voluntary strike off process, 10.09.2020)
Publication
On 10 December 2024, the Companies (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2024 were laid before Parliament, together with an Explanatory Memorandum.
Publication
On 28 November 2024, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published CP24/2, Part 2 in relation to its controversial ‘name and shame’ proposals, having trailed this in oral evidence before the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee earlier in November.
Publication
As previously observed, conflicts occasionally arise between mortgagees and charterers where a mortgagee wishes to take prompt action to enforce its rights, but the charterer wishes such enforcement action to be deferred until the end of the charter.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023