![Global rules on foreign direct investment](https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/images/nrf/nrfweb/knowledge/publications/us_24355_legal-update--fdi-alert.jpeg?w=265&revision=a5124a65-abf9-40e4-8e96-9df39ffdb212&revision=5250068427347387904&hash=96B456347C3246E5649838DF281C5F5D)
Publication
Global rules on foreign direct investment (FDI)
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Author:
Canada | Publication | November 7, 2023
On November 2 the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) updated its online guidance regarding new mandatory disclosure obligations under the Income Tax Act (Canada). The welcomed message for employers is that, in most cases, employment agreements and severance agreements will not be reportable to the CRA.
In June of this year the reportable transaction rules in the Income Tax Act were amended to expand the scope of transactions that taxpayers and, in certain circumstances, their advisors, including lawyers, may be required to disclose to the CRA. The consequences of failing to report are significant. As a result, this potential obligation is one which all taxpayers, including employers, must not take lightly.
In technical terms, a reportable transaction arises where one of the main purposes of a transaction or series of transactions is to obtain a tax benefit (an avoidance transaction) and the transaction has one of three legislated hallmarks – a contingent fee arrangement, confidential protection or contractual protection (such as an indemnity).
For employers and their advisors, confusion arose given the lack of certainty whether arrangements entered into with employees or former employees were captured by the scope of the reportable transaction rules.
In particular, settlement agreements with employees often provide for payments that are structured in a tax efficient manner. This can include direct RRSP contributions or legal fee reimbursements, treating of all or a portion of a settlement payment as a retiring allowance, payment timing (e.g. deferred payments) and allocations to non-taxable damages. An allocation to non-taxable damages might arise, for example, where there are allegations of harassment, discrimination, or bad faith conduct. These settlement agreements also often include an indemnity obligating the employee to indemnify the employer for certain tax liabilities of the employer as a result of the settlement.
In short, an employee settlement agreement could have been viewed as having the necessary elements for a reportable transaction – a tax benefit and a contractual protection in the form of an indemnity.
The updated guidance issued by CRA on November 2 included, among other things, additional examples of activities that would generally not, in and of themselves, be considered by the CRA as meeting a legislative hallmark. In the context of the “contractual protection” hallmark, the CRA guidance included the following statement:
“The contractual protection hallmark will not apply in a normal commercial or investment context in which parties deal with each other at arm's length and act prudently, knowledgeably and willingly, and does not extend contractual protection for a tax treatment in respect of an avoidance transaction. Without providing an exhaustive list of examples, these can include: …
Tax indemnities in employment agreements and severance agreements.”
In other words, the CRA will not generally consider a tax indemnity in most employee settlement agreements as contractual protection where those settlements make common, reasonable allocations and the employer and employee deal at arm’s length. As a result, the updated CRA guidance should eliminate the uncertainty around mandatory reporting for most employee settlements.
That said, settlements that are abusive of allowable allocations (e.g. damages allocations where there is no reasonable factual basis for settlement on that basis), or where the parties do not deal at arm’s length, may still be subject to the reportable transaction rules.
Publication
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Publication
On February 2, 2024, the Belgian Presidency of the Council of the European Union confirmed that the Committee of Permanent Representatives had signed the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Regulation, referred to as the AI Act. Approval by the EU Parliament followed on 13 March 2024, and the AI Act is likely to appear in the EU’s Official Journal around May 2024. The AI Act aims to establish a stringent legal framework governing the development, marketing, and utilisation of artificial intelligence within the region, thereby marking a significant advancement in the regulation of this burgeoning domain.
Publication
The private credit market and direct lending have grown and diversified immensely in the past decade, offering alternative sources and terms of debt compared to those historically provided by the syndicated leveraged loan and public issuance markets. Consequently, they are fast becoming pivotal components in the capital ecosystem, so much so that the Bank of England consider that the private credit market is currently responsible for approximately $1.8 trillion of debt issuance, which is four times its size in 2015. This growth has been particularly pronounced in Europe and the US but there has also been significant activity in Asia.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023