Publication
Competition Act amendments hub
Since 2022, there have been three waves of amendments to the Competition Act resulting in the most significant revisions to Canada’s competition laws in over a decade.
Author:
Canada | Publication | December 10, 2020
Influencer marketing that misleads the public is on the Canadian Competition Bureau’s (the Bureau’s) list of key priorities for the foreseeable future. Brands and marketing agencies that work with influencers (as well as influencers themselves) should abide by the best practices set out below to reduce the risks of getting wrapped up in a Bureau investigation for misleading advertising.
“Influencers” use social media platforms such as Instagram, Twitter, or YouTube, to develop and share content with their followers or subscribers, namely: consumers. Influencer content can include product review videos of anything from power tools to cosmetics, carefully curated lifestyle and fashion photos, and compilations of desirable products, like the most comfortable face masks (#pandemic) or the best Christmas gifts for the foodie in your life.
The difficulty with this form of marketing, according to the Bureau, is the average consumer may not be able to determine whether an influencer that endorses a particular product or brand is being compensated in some way to do so. If he or she is, the Bureau’s view is that such content may engage the deceptive marketing provisions of the Competition Act if the fact of the compensation or benefit is not disclosed.
Given these concerns, the Bureau undertook an industry sweep at the start of 2020 – sending letters to 100 brands and marketing agencies in a wide variety of industries reminding them to comply with applicable advertising and competition laws.1 The Bureau also released influencer marketing guidelines, updated its Deceptive Marketing Practices Digest to reflect online influencers,2 and included both digital services and online marketing as key sectors for enforcement work in its annual plan for 2020-2021.3
The Bureau’s priority focus on influencer marketing likely reflects the emergence of this form of advertising as a force to be reckoned with. In fact, more than one-third of Canadian adults under 35 report having made a purchase based on an influencer’s recommendation.4 This number will only increase as a record number of consumers are expected to shop online this holiday season to respect physical distancing measures.
DO disclose all connections to relevant brands and products
In all posts, stories, and other online content that promotes a particular brand, product, or service, influencers should be clear about their “material connections” to the company in question. A material connection can include: receipt of payments or commissions; receipt of free, loaned, or discounted products, services, travel or tickets; or a personal or family relationship.
Disclosures must be:
DON’T create misleading content
In addition to disclosing all material connections to the company in question, influencers should base any reviews, opinions or testimonials on actual experience and should ensure that representations are:
For example, influencers could discuss their personal opinions after having used a cosmetics product, but should not make broad or generalized assertions that cannot be backed up. They might indicate that a product successfully covered their blemishes, but should not unequivocally promise it will cover all blemishes, unless such a claim is specifically endorsed by the company and based on adequate and proper testing. Brands should regularly verify that influencers are not making performance claims on their behalf unless these criteria are met.
Health claims are especially sensitive and typically need to be based on the product’s Health Canada-approved label. Influencers must stick to what has been approved and not exaggerate health benefits. The Bureau is working closely with Health Canada to crack down on unlicensed and unsubstantiated claims related to COVID-19 prevention or treatment.5
Companies should also avoid “astroturfing,” which includes sponsoring fake consumer reviews or testimonials or any other commercial representations that appear to be the genuine and authentic experiences of impartial consumers, but are not. Astroturfing includes requesting that company employees post their own positive reviews to inflate the average rating of the company online.
DO communicate regularly with influencers about your policies and expectations
Companies that regularly advertise or promote their products or services through influencers should develop or maintain influencer marketing policies covering the above-noted points and include reference to them in any contracts. All influencers affiliated with the company through receipt of paid sponsorships or free or discounted products, services or trips or other compensation or benefits should receive the policy at least biannually, as should employees and any agents the company engages for advertising.
It may also be appropriate for companies to include reminders about best practices every time they send a product or perk to an influencer.
Companies should regularly review posts by influencers to ensure they comply with best practices. The influencer’s conduct can be made a material condition of the marketing arrangement. Morality clauses in digital marketing agreements allow for the unilateral termination of an agreement should a contracting party engage in reprehensible behavior that may negatively impact its public image and by association, the company’s brand.6 This way, should an influencer put out content that is problematic from a competition compliance standpoint, the company can take action to limit the fallout. As with any contractual relationship, providing clear guidelines as to marketing expectations can make the difference between a good and great influencer relationship.
The influencer advertising market is unlikely to shrink anytime soon and neither influencers nor brands will want to cut themselves off from the potential revenues associated with it, but they should do so wisely. Specifically, influencers will need to disclose all material connections and avoid creating misleading content, which may have the added bonus of increasing their legitimacy in the eyes of their followers.
Meanwhile, brands should work with influencers who are following such best practices and should develop a social media policy and circulate it to employees, influencers, advertising agencies, and other relevant parties. They should also actively review compliance with the policy and should consider incorporating morality clauses into their contractual agreements with influencers.
In other words, if you want to do it for the ‘gram, don’t forget the Bureau.
Publication
Since 2022, there have been three waves of amendments to the Competition Act resulting in the most significant revisions to Canada’s competition laws in over a decade.
Publication
Since January 1, 2024, federal legislation in Canada requires companies of a certain size that produce, sell, distribute or import goods into Canada to file a report by May 31 each year regarding the risks of forced labour and child labour in their business and supply chains and the efforts taken to reduce those risks.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023