data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44c32/44c32199a0845fe81ecf645263198d93531d178d" alt="Workplace-work-safety-employment-labor-harness-AdobeStock_208704455"
Publication
WHS Law Briefing
Welcome to our WHS Law Briefing. This briefing identifies key issues and emerging trends in WHS Law, and details significant legislative and case law developments from August 2024 to date in February 2025.
Author:
Canada | Publication | February 20, 2025
An Ontario court has delivered yet another unfortunate termination clause decision1. Employers may see articles and blogs once again announcing that a wide range of termination clauses are unenforceable and employees are free to claim expansive damages upon dismissal.
The reality is that the law of employment contract termination clauses is unsettled in Ontario at the moment, and this latest decision merely adds to the uncertainty.
This time around:
The reasoning here was that such language reserves the right to terminate when an employee is subject to legal protections, such as during a statutory leave of absence.
This ruling was made despite the fact the clause in question committed to payment of “any minimum compensation or entitlements prescribed by the Employment Standards Act.” The reasoning here was that “a regular employee cannot be expected to appreciate the difference” between scenarios in which employees are entitled to statutory amounts, and scenarios where they are not.
Both of these conclusions run counter to recent decisions from the same court – the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Until the Ontario Court of Appeal steps in to resolve this competing case law, employers and employees cannot know whether:
Until we receive clarity, employers should:
Publication
Welcome to our WHS Law Briefing. This briefing identifies key issues and emerging trends in WHS Law, and details significant legislative and case law developments from August 2024 to date in February 2025.
Publication
At Norton Rose Fulbright in Australia, pro bono is part of our firm’s cultural make-up and our social licence to operate.
Publication
It is critical that Australian business leaders consider the psychosocial risk perspective on gender diversity and ensure that their decision-making on this issue aligns with their obligations under work health and safety laws.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025