Publikation
Die Kunst des Streitens
Mit unserem Newsletter möchten wir Ihnen praktische Hinweise und prägnante Analysen der wichtigsten Rechtsprechung und jüngsten Entwicklungen im Bereich der Streitbeilegung an die Hand geben.
Global | Publikation | August 2024
China’s legal framework for foreign direct investment (FDI) screening / reviews is set out in the Foreign Investment Law and its implementation rules which came into effect on 1 January 2020 (the FIL) and are supplemented by legislation governing specific areas (as further detailed below).
Unless a FDI falls within a regulated industry, in which case the approval from the relevant industry-specific regulatory authority would be required, there are generally three layers of screening / reviews that need to be considered for FDIs into China:
Consistent with the Chinese government’s constant efforts to open the Chinese market to foreign investments, the Negative Lists have been substantially shortened over the last decades. The latest Negative Lists were issued and came into effect on 1 January 2022 and only contain a short list of industry sectors (or business activities), as listed below, which are still subject to market-entry prohibitions and / or restrictions:
On 19 March 2024, the State Council issued a new action plan containing 24 measures to promote a high-quality opening-up of the Chinese market and attract foreign investment. One of the measures is to further shorten the Negative Lists by removing Item C above from the Negative Lists (hence a full liberalisation of the manufacturing sector) and further liberalising the telecom and medical sectors. In addition, pilot schemes will be implemented in certain free trade zones (such as those in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong) where qualified foreign-invested companies will be permitted to engage in the development and application of gene diagnosis and treatment technologies. It is therefore expected that a new and shorter version of the Negative Lists will be published soon.
Foreign investments into China, whether through greenfield investments, or M&A transactions are subject to the national security review regime if certain conditions are satisfied. Pursuant to the Security Review Measures, “designated important industries” and “control of the target businesses falling within the scope of designated important industries” are two major determinants of whether a foreign investment requires a national security review in China. For a general introduction to China’s national security review regime, please refer to our previous article through this link: Chinas New Measures on Security Review of Foreign Investment | China | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbright.
As the Security Review Measures only contain very brief and generic provisions, whether or not the national security review regime applies to a particular foreign investment project is, to a great degree, subject to the discretion of the security review operational mechanism office (the Office) jointly led by NDRC and MOC. In practice, the Office accepts prior consultation via its published hotline numbers. If a foreign investment project may potentially trigger the need for a national security review in China, a preliminary consultation with the Office prior to the investment would be recommended.
It is also worth noting that MOC has been maintaining China’s Unreliable Entity List (UEL) since the relevant legislation was promulgated in 2020. Companies on the UEL are barred from, amongst others, making new investments into China. Please refer to our previous article on this topic for more information: China’s Ministry of Commerce issues Measures on Unreliable Entities List | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbright.
So far, only a handful of entities have been put on the UEL but it is worth watching how the regime may be enforced in future and whether this list may become longer. Generally speaking, any foreign investment into China made by a foreign investor which is on the UEL or associated with an entity on the UEL would be subject to close scrutiny or rejected by the relevant PRC regulators.
China has, since the AML took effect in 2008, established a reasonably comprehensive merger control regime consisting of the AML and various implementing rules, measures and guidelines. Under these laws and regulations, the various thresholds that would trigger a compulsory merger control declaration in China were relatively low compared with the equivalent thresholds in some other jurisdictions.
To effectively exclude relatively small to medium sized transactions from the scope of a merger control declarations and expedite the process of foreign investments into China, on 22 January 2024, the State Council issued the revised Regulation on Declaration Thresholds for Concentrations of Undertakings (the New Regulation on the Declaration Thresholds), pursuant to which the merger control declaration thresholds are significantly increased, as follows:
A transaction reaching either set of the thresholds mentioned above must be submitted to the Anti-Monopoly Bureau under the State Administration for Market Regulation for merger control clearance before closing. The increase of these thresholds could potentially reduce the number of FDIs and M&A transactions that are subject to the merger control declaration regime, hence it is a positive legislative development for FDIs into China.
Please note however that the New Regulation on the Declaration Thresholds reiterates that the Anti-Monopoly Bureau is empowered to request the undertakings concerned to declare a transaction which, although not meeting the aforesaid thresholds, has or is likely to have the effect of “eliminating or restricting competition”. The Anti-Monopoly Bureau may exercise discretion in determining whether or not a transaction may fall within this scope, and therefore foreign investors intending to make investments into any industry sector which has a high market concentration and fewer market players, should be mindful of the possible application of the merger control declaration requirements even though the applicable thresholds are not met.
For more information on China’s merger control regime, please find articles of our competition team through these links: The new SAMR merger compliance guidelines | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbright, People’s Republic of China: Competition law fact sheet | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbright.
Publikation
Mit unserem Newsletter möchten wir Ihnen praktische Hinweise und prägnante Analysen der wichtigsten Rechtsprechung und jüngsten Entwicklungen im Bereich der Streitbeilegung an die Hand geben.
Publikation
Ein Auslandsbezug im Sinne der EuGVVO liegt vor, wenn sich zwei in demselben EuGVVO-Mitgliedstaat wohnhafte Parteien im Rahmen einer Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung auf die internationale Zuständigkeit der Gerichte eines anderen EuGVVO-Mitgliedstaats verständigt haben.
Publikation
Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) wirft zahlreiche Rechtsfragen des geistigen Eigentums (IP) auf, insbesondere bei generativen KI-Systemen (GenAI), die Algorithmen zur Erzeugung neuer Inhalte verwenden. Dieser Artikel untersucht die wichtigsten IP-Probleme im Zusammenhang mit GenAI-Systemen aus der Perspektive der Streitbeilegung und der Prozessführung in Deutschland.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023