![Digital concept of data flow](https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/images/nrf/hero/digital-concept-flow-lights.jpg?w=265&revision=&revision=4611686018427387904&hash=1DBB7BD88F7D40EFEAB403B51B115D8F)
Publication
L’IA générative
L’intelligence artificielle (IA) soulève de nombreuses questions en matière de propriété intellectuelle (PI).
Australie | Publication | 1 April 2020
The disruption caused by the COVID-19 virus across the supply chains of businesses in almost every industry has resulted in business’ contractual rights and obligations coming under the spotlight – specifically in terms of what can be used to excuse a party from performing their contractual obligations temporarily or, in some cases, indefinitely. One of the key legal provisions this update is focussing on is force majeure clauses.
“Force majeure” clauses are usually relied on to mitigate the risk that the performance of a contractual obligation may be delayed or prevented by an unforeseen event or circumstance beyond a party’s reasonable control. They are often associated with acts of god.
They work in two different ways – if your business is struggling, you may wish to exercise your right of force majeure upon a contractual counter-party to provide some temporary, or even permanent, contractual relief.
Alternatively, your contractual counter-party may choose to exercise this same right against you. In this situation, you will likely wish to establish whether they can validly do so and work out what you should do next (considered further below).
They are creatures of contract – no general Australian law force majeure remedy exists. It must be specifically included in a contract. A force majeure clause must be specifically included in a contract in order to attempt to rely on this remedy.1
If your business wishes to excuse itself from a contract and it does not have a force majeure clause, there are alternatives including:
They must be reviewed in detail – the devil is in the detail and each clause requires a thorough review before acting on (or challenging) them.
These clauses usually contain four main elements which should be separately considered:
There exists an obligation on the party affected by a force majeure event to mitigate its effect – this essentially means that the affected party should be taking reasonable steps to lessen the effect of the event on its ability to perform its obligations.
What to do when you receive a notification of force majeure – once you have established your counter-party’s basic right to exercise their right of force majeure:
REMEMBER: The sooner you can map out where you stand, the better.
Force majeure clauses are relatively easily identifiable, usually being self-titled, and nearly always towards the end of a contract.
Usually by the mutual agreement of the parties.
The doctrine of frustration covers the situation where a contract cannot be performed because of a radical change in circumstances, so radical that the situation is now fundamentally different to what the parties had in mind.
Any uncertainty is likely to be construed against them.
Publication
L’intelligence artificielle (IA) soulève de nombreuses questions en matière de propriété intellectuelle (PI).
Publication
Depuis 2022, le gouvernement du Canada a apporté trois vagues de modifications à la Loi sur la concurrence (Loi), apportant des modifications importantes aux lois canadiennes sur la concurrence, les plus récentes modifications ayant reçu la sanction royale le 20 juin 2024. Notre publication sur toutes les modifications se trouve ici.
Publication
Les systèmes d’IA générative sont entraînés au moyen de gros volumes de données, souvent tirées de sources du domaine public qui peuvent être protégées par le droit d’auteur ou d’autres droits de propriété intellectuelle, comme un droit sur les bases de données au Royaume-Uni et dans l’UE.
Abonnez-vous et restez à l’affût des nouvelles juridiques, informations et événements les plus récents...
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023