![Global rules on foreign direct investment](https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/images/nrf/nrfweb/knowledge/publications/us_24355_legal-update--fdi-alert.jpeg?w=265&revision=a5124a65-abf9-40e4-8e96-9df39ffdb212&revision=5250068427347387904&hash=96B456347C3246E5649838DF281C5F5D)
Publication
Global rules on foreign direct investment (FDI)
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Global | Publication | November 2018
This article was first published in Property Week, November 1, 2018
Since the Brexit vote, property investors may want to know whether UK judgments will continue to be enforceable in the courts of EU member states when the UK leaves the EU.
If proceedings are brought in the UK courts against a defaulting tenant (who, for argument’s sake, is based in Spain), will the landlord be able to enforce that judgment in the Spanish courts? The issue does not just affect landlords, but any party wishing to enforce a UK judgment against a counterparty based in the EU.
Under the current regime (the Recast Brussels Regulation), a civil or commercial judgment given in an EU member state is enforceable in all other EU member states. No special procedure or declaration of enforceability is needed and there are few defences available. But preserving the status quo after Brexit will require the agreement of the EU. If no agreement is reached and no alternative regime is put in place, enforcement will become a matter for the domestic law of the state in which the judgment is being enforced. This might be more complicated, but is almost certainly achievable.
There are alternatives to the Brussels Regulation. One possibility is the Lugano Convention, which applies to the enforcement of judgments between EU member states and European Free Trade Association countries, but the UK joining this convention would require the agreement of the other contracting states.
Another alternative is the Hague Choice of Court Convention, an international agreement pursuant to which the courts of contracting states agree to uphold exclusive jurisdiction agreements and to recognise and enforce judgments. The UK participates by virtue of its EU membership, but will cease to do so on its exit. In a paper published in September, the government confirmed its intention to accede to the Hague Convention as an independent contracting state in the event of a no-deal Brexit. The government has since published a draft statutory instrument that would give effect to this, the intention being that this would come into effect on 1 April 2019.
The Hague Convention does not go as far as the Brussels Regulation. Certain prescribed standards must be met. It only applies insofar as the parties have agreed that the courts of a particular country have exclusive jurisdiction in the event of a dispute – and such clauses must therefore be included in contracts. However, the Hague Convention has the advantage that it covers all EU member states (as well as Singapore, Mexico and Montenegro) and the UK can subscribe to it unilaterally without the agreement of the EU.
The hope is the Hague Convention will provide a minimum regime for enforcing UK judgments throughout the EU following Brexit. The government’s recent publications suggest this is likely to be the case.
Publication
Cross-border acquisitions and investments increasingly trigger foreign direct investment (FDI) screening requirements.
Publication
On February 2, 2024, the Belgian Presidency of the Council of the European Union confirmed that the Committee of Permanent Representatives had signed the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Regulation, referred to as the AI Act. Approval by the EU Parliament followed on 13 March 2024, and the AI Act is likely to appear in the EU’s Official Journal around May 2024. The AI Act aims to establish a stringent legal framework governing the development, marketing, and utilisation of artificial intelligence within the region, thereby marking a significant advancement in the regulation of this burgeoning domain.
Publication
The private credit market and direct lending have grown and diversified immensely in the past decade, offering alternative sources and terms of debt compared to those historically provided by the syndicated leveraged loan and public issuance markets. Consequently, they are fast becoming pivotal components in the capital ecosystem, so much so that the Bank of England consider that the private credit market is currently responsible for approximately $1.8 trillion of debt issuance, which is four times its size in 2015. This growth has been particularly pronounced in Europe and the US but there has also been significant activity in Asia.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023